Radeon RX Vega 11 vs Radeon 760M

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon RX Vega 11 with 11 pipelines and 704 shaders against the 4 years and 11 months newer Radeon 760M that utilizes 8 pipelines and 512 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Radeon 760M over RX Vega 11
Reasons to consider the Radeon RX Vega 11
  • Has 38% more shading units (704 vs 512)
Reasons to consider the Radeon 760M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 90%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
  • Shows 63% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 13 vs 8 FPS
  • 45% higher maximum theoretical performance (2.9 vs 2 TFLOPS)
  • Ray-tracing support with 6 dedicated RT cores
  • Achieves 69% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (22K vs 13K)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
19
10
-
-
41
21
17
9
The Witcher 3
-
-
-
-
19
19
9
-
Counter-Strike 2
22
16
11
-
35
23
19
-
Far Cry 6
16
14
-
-
32
24
19
-
Hogwarts Legacy
9
-
-
-
15
12
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
20
14
12
-
28
24
17
10
Ghost of Tsushima
12
-
-
-
19
11
9
-
Cyberpunk 2077
-
-
-
-
14
16
9
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
14
13
9
-
26
23
14
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 14 25
1080p Ultra 10 19
1440p Ultra - 13
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
1082
2056
Time Spy 1148 2372
Solar Bay - 9378
Port Royal - 975
Fire Strike 3781 7074
Wild Life Extreme 2424 4630
Night Raid 14555 29486
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
13375
22589
Background Blur 33.1 img/sec 57.8 img/sec
Face Detection 14.7 img/sec 28.7 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.45 Gpixels/sec 0.8 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.72 Gpixels/sec 1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.6 Gpixels/sec 0.82 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 45.5 Gpixels/sec 85.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 1490.9 FPS 2844.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
2087
Radeon 760M +154%
5311
G2D Mark 504 890
DirectX 11 13 FPS 52 FPS
DirectX 12 11 FPS 25 FPS
GPU Compute 1342 Ops/s 2838 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 4504 & 2585 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
88.84
Radeon 760M +167%
237.24
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 17 & 37 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
2806
Radeon 760M +189%
8097
GB6 ML Half Precision
3981
Radeon 760M +182%
11246
GB6 ML Quantized
2067
Radeon 760M +190%
6004
Image Classification (SP) 1115 3449
Image Segmentation (HP) 1530 4098
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2611 7937
Face Detection (HP) 3671 12168
Pose Estimation (Q) 9385 29915
Text Classification (SP) 972 2571
Machine Translation (HP) 1490 3852
Object Detection (SP) 1196 2687
Depth Estimation (Q) 4845 14163
Style Transfer (SP) 21060 59966
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX Vega 11 and Radeon 760M

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Build Integrated Integrated
Released February 13, 2018 January 4, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture GCN 5.0 RDNA 3.0
GPU Codename Raven Phoenix
Rival Equivalent - GeForce MX250 - Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
Successor - - Radeon 8040S
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 2400G or above - AMD Ryzen 5 7640U or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- AMD Ryzen 5 230
- AMD Ryzen 5 240
- AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
- AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
Laptop GPU ranking (146th and 112th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 800 MHz
Boost Clock 1250-1400 MHz (configurable) 2600-2800 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 704 512
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 44 32
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 16
Compute Units (Pipelines) 11 8
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores No 6
L1 Cache - 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache - 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 20-22 GPixel/s 42-45 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 55-62 GTexel/s 83-90 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
1.8-2 TFLOPS
2.7-2.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface IGP PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 25 W 15 W
Manufacturing GlobalFoundries TSMC
Fabrication Process 14 nm 4 nm
Die Size 210 mm² 178 mm²
Transistor Count 4.94 billion 25.4 billion
Transistor Density 23.52 MTr/mm² 142.7 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size System RAM Dependent -
Memory Clock System RAM Dependent -
Effective Memory Speed System RAM Dependent -
ECC No -

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2.131 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 2.1
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
1 (16.7%)
5 (83.3%)
Total votes: 6

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!