Asus TUF Gaming A15 (2023) vs Acer Nitro 16 (AN16-41)

Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
Display
CPU
GPU
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of Asus TUF Gaming A15 (2023) and Acer Nitro 16 (AN16-41) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
21.6
(Mediocre)
Value Index
43.4
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the Asus TUF Gaming A15 (2023)
  • Significantly easier to carry: weighs 600 grams less (around 1.32 lbs)
  • Thinner bezels and 3% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Much smaller footprint: 12% more compact case (137.8 vs 156.2 square inches)
Advantages of the Acer Nitro 16 (AN16-41)
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 165 versus 144 Hz
  • Performs significantly better (up to 79%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Can run popular games at about 39-53% higher FPS
  • Includes an old-school USB-A port
  • Provides 100% higher max. screen brightness: 500 vs 250 nits

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs

Case

Weight 2.2 kg (4.85 lbs) 2.8 kg (6.17 lbs)
Dimensions 354 x 251 x 22.4-24.9 mm
13.94 x 9.88 x 0.88-0.98 inches
360.1 x 279.9 x 27.9 mm
14.18 x 11.02 x 1.1 inches
Area 889 cm2 (137.7 inches2) 1008 cm2 (156.3 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~75.5% ~73.6%
Side bezels 4.3 mm 7.8 mm
Colors Gray Black
Material Top: Aluminum
Middle: Plastic
Bottom: Plastic
Plastic
Transformer No No
Opening angle 145° 165°
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No Yes
Number of fans 2 2
Max. fan speed (RPM) - 6178 RPM
Noise level (max. load) 43 dB 45 dB

Display

Size 15.6 inches 16 inches
Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Refresh rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
PPI 141 ppi 142 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:9 16:10
Resolution 1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1200 pixels
HDR support No No
Sync technology Adaptive Sync G-Sync
Touchscreen No No
Coating Matte Matte
Ambient light sensor No No
Screen space comparison
Nitro 16 (AN16-41)
16″ (16:10 ratio) = 115.1 in2
TUF Gaming A15 (2023)
15.6″ (16:9 ratio) = 104 in2
~10% more screen space
Display tests
Contrast 1694:1 -
sRGB color space 100% 100%
Adobe RGB profile 75.3% -
DCI-P3 color gamut 100% 91%
Response time 7 ms 7 ms
Max. brightness
500 nits

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time 1:46 hr 2:20 hr
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes Yes
Charging port position Left Bottom
Charge power 200 / 240 W 230 / 280 / 330 W
Weight of AC adapter 500 / 735 grams 620 / 820 / 1361 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 3.3 GHz 3.3 GHz
Turbo frequency 4.55 GHz 4.55 GHz
Cores 6 6
Threads 12 12
L3 Cache 16 MB 16 MB
Integrated GPU Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
Fabrication process 6 nm 6 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 95 W 140 W
Nvidia Optimus MUX Yes, Advanced Optimus
Type Dedicated Dedicated
Fabrication process 8 nm 5 nm
GPU base clock 1530 MHz 2070 MHz
GPU boost clock 1740 MHz 2370 MHz
FLOPS 7.9 TFLOPS 13.4 TFLOPS
Memory size 6 GB 6 GB
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bus 128 bit 96 bit
Memory speed 12 Gbps ~16 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 2048 2560
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 64 80
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 40 32
GPU performance 7.9 TFLOPS 13.4 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Blender GPU 1152 2970
Solar Bay 23560 37614
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details

RAM

RAM size
Channels 1x8 GB 1x8 GB
Clock 4800 MHz 4800 MHz
Type DDR5 DDR5
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
Max. ram size 32 GB 32 GB

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x512 GB 1x512 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 2
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 2.0
Power 2x2W 2x2W
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Loudness ~79.3 dB ~82 dB
Microphones 2 1

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6 v6E
Bluetooth v5.3 v5.2
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor No No
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1280 x 720 1280 x 720
Ports
USB-A 2x USB 3.2 3x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 4.0 2x USB 3.2
Thunderbolt No No
HDMI 1x HDMI 2.1 1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) Yes Yes
SD card reader No Yes
Proprietary charging port Yes Yes

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes Yes
Backlight Yes Yes
Key travel 1.7 mm 1.4 mm
Touchpad
Surface Plastic Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
17 (34.7%)
32 (65.3%)
Total votes: 49

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of Acer Nitro 16 (AN16-41) and Asus TUF Gaming A15 (2023) or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Torsten Barbar June 3, 2025 at 03:36 PM
The Nitro 16-41 comes with a 135W charger, which is insane as it can't even power the gfx card at full load, (140W) which means the battery will drain even when connected to an outlet when in use. The A15 with the same specs get a 240W charger out of the box.
+1 Reply
Avatar
AYA June 11, 2024 at 05:32 PM
The nitro 16 does not has Thunderbolt 4. it has usb 4 but not a thunderbolt for sure probably just amd version.
0 Reply
Serhii June 12, 2024 at 05:58 AM
Thank you for helping.
0 Reply