Samsung Galaxy M14 vs Galaxy A14
43
out of 100
VS
38
out of 100
Here we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.6-inch Samsung Galaxy M14 (with Exynos 1330) that was released on March 8, 2023, against the Samsung Galaxy A14, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G80. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy M14
- 81% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (607K versus 334K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
- More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 1330
- Faster storage type - UFS 2.2 versus eMMC 5.1
- 2.3x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 952 and 413 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | PLS TFT | PLS TFT |
| Size | 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels | 1080 x 2408 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 400 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 450 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 80.4% |
| RGB color space | - | 97.3% |
| PWM | - | 343500 Hz |
| Response time | - | 26 ms |
| Contrast | - | 989:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 166.8 mm (6.57 inches) | 167.7 mm (6.6 inches) |
| Width | 77.2 mm (3.04 inches) | 78 mm (3.07 inches) |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm (0.37 inches) | 9.1 mm (0.36 inches) |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Silver, Blue | Black, Silver, Green, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1330 | MediaTek Helio G80 |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 |
| L3 cache | - | 1 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 5 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 48 |
| GPU clock | 949 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~121.5 GFLOPS | ~91.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 1077 |
| Single-core score | 952 | 413 |
| Multi-core score | 1963 | 1364 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 274218 | 131446 |
| GPU | 42656 | 25675 |
| Memory | 107262 | 76235 |
| UX | 183353 | 101591 |
| Total score | 607489 | 334947 |
| Samples | [4 tests] | [4 tests] |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 97% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| Graphics score | 364 | 180 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 9166 | 5734 |
| Video editing | 7189 | 4036 |
| Photo editing | 21185 | 9919 |
| Data manipulation | 8551 | 5749 |
| Writing score | 14272 | 7939 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy M14
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-16 (ACIMASIZ) | AnTuTu 12 | 706733 |
| 📘 2026-04-09 (ACIMASIZ) | AnTuTu 11 | 629190 |
| 📘 2026-04-01 (Cosmic) | AnTuTu 11 | 585648 |
| 📘 2026-03-14 (Jaq) | AnTuTu 11 | 556354 |
| 📘 2025-12-08 (G4T0) | AnTuTu 11 | 607489 |
Samsung Galaxy A14
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-24 (.) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 1028 |
| 📘 2026-06-24 (.) | AnTuTu 11 | 334947 |
| 📘 2026-06-13 -> Nino_anes | AnTuTu 11 | 261998 |
| 📘 2026-02-07 (Breno Barbosa) | AnTuTu 11 | 341488 |
| 📘 2025-11-20 (.) | CPU Throttle | 93% |
Memory
| RAM size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | One UI 7.0 | One UI Core 5.0 |
| OS size | 17.3 GB | 17.3 GB |
| OS updates | 2 years | 2 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (30% in 30 min) | Yes (27% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:22 hr | 2:18 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 08:50 hr |
| Watching video | - | 12:50 hr |
| Gaming | - | 05:38 hr |
| Standby | - | 92 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8160 x 6120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | - | 120 FPS (720p) |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Macro: 2 MP 3) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 5 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | - | 26 mm |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | - | 5 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 17 mm |
| Sensor size | - | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
| Image resolution | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | - | 26 mm |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | - | 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch) |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 18 | 7 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | March 2023 | February 2023 |
| Release date | March 2023 | March 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $200 | $169 |
| Successor | - Samsung Galaxy M16 5G | - Samsung Galaxy A17 4G |
| SAR (head) | 0.48 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 1.53 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy M14 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 219