Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus vs S22 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.2-inch Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (with Exynos 9 Octa 9810) that was released on February 25, 2018, against the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, which is powered by Exynos 2200 and came out 4 years after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 400GB
  • Weighs 39 grams less
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
  • 2.7x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1434K versus 540K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • Has a 0.6 inch larger screen size
  • Comes with 1500 mAh larger battery capacity: 5000 vs 3500 mAh
  • Delivers 100% higher peak brightness (1266 against 633 nits)
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • Shows 38% longer battery life (23:05 vs 16:44 hours)
  • Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 15W)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 10
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 2200

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus and S22 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Should I update?
No 98% Yes
Yes, this is a clear and meaningful upgrade.
Updating from Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus to Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a clear step forward, and the improvements should be easy to notice.
Main improvements: camera, performance, and battery life.

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Super AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.2 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1440 x 2960 pixels 1440 x 3088 pixels
Aspect ratio 18.5:9 19.3:9
PPI 531 ppi 500 ppi
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (24-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 631 nits 830 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1750 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 83.6% 89.8%
Display features - Always-On Display - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 98.2%
PWM 215 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 7 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Galaxy S22 Ultra
6.8″ (19.3:9 ratio) = 17.7 in2
Galaxy S9 Plus
6.2″ (18.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~17% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
633 nits
1266 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 158.1 mm (6.22 inches) 163.3 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 73.8 mm (2.91 inches) 77.9 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 8.5 mm (0.33 inches) 8.9 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 189 g (6.67 oz) 228 g (8.04 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Gold, Gray, Red, Purple White, Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, rear Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9810 Samsung Exynos 2200
Max clock 2900 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Exynos M3
- 4 cores at 1.82 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 2.52 GHz: Cortex-A710
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X2
L3 cache - 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 10 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G72MP18 Xclipse 920
GPU shading units 216 384
GPU clock 572 MHz 1306 MHz
FLOPS ~247.1 GFLOPS ~1003 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 4338 -
Single-core score 772 1648
Multi-core score 2229 4351
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1434169
CPU 231778 472427
GPU 92936 390230
Memory 117962 216173
UX 97635 355339
Total score 540311 1434169
Samples [16 tests] [17 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 66%
Graphics test - 7 FPS
Graphics score - 900
3DMark Solar Bay
Stability - 65%
Graphics test - 15 FPS
Section 1 - 18 FPS
Section 2 - 15 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
Graphics score - 3874
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability - 66%
Graphics test - 11 FPS
Graphics score - 1967
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
13594
Web score 5779 13423
Video editing 5456 7399
Photo editing 9308 24771
Data manipulation 5607 12643
Writing score 6203 16337

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-10 -> skaeleAnTuTu635840
📘 2026-06-23 (AGZL)AnTuTu669835
📘 2026-05-28 -> W1lkyyAnTuTu614260
📘 2026-05-14 -> TranHongPhucGeekBench GPU4338
📘 2026-05-14 -> TranHongPhucGeekBench CPU686 / 1855
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-21 (RAID_0)GeekBench GPU10479
📘 2026-07-12 (João_Rosário_67)AnTuTu1474557
📘 2026-06-09 (Unknown)AnTuTu1318666
📘 2026-04-18 (Fsoceinty)AnTuTu1329673
📘 2026-03-28 (Bakzhan)AnTuTu1530447

Memory

RAM
RAM size 4 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory clock 1794 MHz -
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 64 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 400 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 8.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 10) Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM One UI 2.5 One UI 8.0
OS size 13.9 GB 26.8 GB
OS updates - 4 years
Security updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 3500 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 15 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes, Qi/PMA (10 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging No Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (40% in 30 min) Yes (60% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:40 hr 0:59 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:05 hr 09:06 hr
Watching video 10:25 hr 13:47 hr
Gaming 04:17 hr 05:57 hr
Standby 84 hr 113 hr
General battery life
16:44 hr
23:05 hr

Main camera

Matrix 12 megapixels 108 megapixels
Image resolution 4032 x 3024 12000 x 9000
Zoom Optical, 2x Optical, 10x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No Up to 24FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 240FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens - 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 12 MP
2) Telephoto: 12 MP
1) Standard: 108 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 12 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 12 MP 108 MP
Aperture f/1.5 - 2.4 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung SAK2L3 Samsung S5KHM3
Sensor size 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) 1/1.33" (≈ 0.75 inch)
Pixel size 1.4 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 12 MP 10 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/4.9
Focal length 52 mm 230 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX574
Sensor size 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) 1/3.52" (≈ 0.28 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution - 12 MP
Aperture - f/2.2
Focal length - 13 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX563
Sensor size - 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size - 1.4 micron
Stabilization - Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 70
Preview - 73
Zoom - 141
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus from DxOMark Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 40 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 7864 x 5200
Aperture f/1.7 f/2.2
Focal length 25 mm 26 mm
Sensor Samsung S5K3H1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) 1/2.82" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1440p at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No
DxOMark front camera
Photo - 139
Video - 145

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.2
Bluetooth features PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.1 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot Yes No
LTE Cat* 18 20
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
85.6 dB
90.2 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced February 2018 February 2022
Release date March 2018 March 2022
Launch price (MSRP) $840 $1199
Successor - Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra -
SAR (head) 0.294 W/kg 1.05 W/kg
SAR (body) 1.35 W/kg 1.58 W/kg
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger - Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
31 (31.6%)
67 (68.4%)
Total votes: 98

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!