Dimensity 8400 vs Dimensity 7300

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (with Mali-G720 MP7 graphics) and Dimensity 7300 (Mali-G615 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Performs 4.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 166% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.2x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1948K vs 879K
  • Has 2 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 7300
  • 30% higher CPU clock speed (3250 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1948428
CPU 623766 320191
GPU 596540 128437
Memory 331200 164451
UX 396922 266635
Total score 1948428 879714
Samples [313 tests] [311 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
6239
Asset compression 248.7 MB/sec 166 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 189.2 pages/sec 68.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 189.3 Mpixels/sec 114.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 111.1 images/sec 53.4 images/sec
HDR 166.2 Mpixels/sec 102.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 19.8 images/sec 10.7 images/sec
Photo processing 58 images/sec 25.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.1 Mpixels/sec 4.62 Mpixels/sec
Samples 45 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
Background blur 21.3 images/sec 4.57 images/sec
Face detection 11.1 images/sec 2.52 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.52 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.71 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.66 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 37.2 Gpixels/sec 4.25 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1703.3 FPS 439.4 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 31 tests 40 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1346 346
Stability 86% 98%
Graphics test 10 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 5948 -
Graphics test 23 FPS -
Section 1 25 FPS -
Section 2 23 FPS -
Section 3 20 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
14015
Web score 14034 13221
Video editing score 6661 6420
Data manipulation score 13175 9644
Photo editing score 23584 35886
Writing score 17637 16658
Phones tested 5 models 22 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (JenKenny)AnTuTu2063774
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (Subhankar)AnTuTu2057301
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (Vyx)AnTuTu2023750
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (Alex)AnTuTu2004654
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Siam)AnTuTu2105375
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (meroka)AnTuTu906964
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Prawowok)AnTuTu857794
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (hazlanmy)AnTuTu913495
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (Dawid)AnTuTu831901
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (Fabricy)CPU Throttle92%

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8400 and Dimensity 7300

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3250 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP7 Mali-G615 MP2
Architecture 5th gen Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1047 MHz
Pipelines 7 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 896 256
FLOPS 2329.6 Gigaflops 536.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 MediaTek APU 655

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 3270 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 6.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2024 June 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6899, MT6899Z MT6878 MT6878V/ZA MT6878V_A/ZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7300 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 7400
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - β€œDimensity 8400 Ultra” is the same chip as β€œDimensity 8400” but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
247 (90.1%)
27 (9.9%)
Total votes: 274

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7300 and Dimensity 8400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Hoda October 17, 2025 at 02:06 PM
8400 is far better than the 7300
+9 Reply
Avatar
eli February 3, 2025 at 06:08 PM
easy win for 8400 ...
+29 Reply