Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8400

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8450 (with Mali-G720 MP7 graphics) and Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2016572
1948428
CPU 656057 623766
GPU 641242 596540
Memory 256365 331200
UX 462908 396922
Total score 2016572 1948428
Samples [25 tests] [313 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 281.1 MB/sec 248.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 197.4 pages/sec 189.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 233.6 Mpixels/sec 189.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 138.6 images/sec 111.1 images/sec
HDR 200.8 Mpixels/sec 166.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 24 images/sec 19.8 images/sec
Photo processing 55.9 images/sec 58 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.2 Mpixels/sec 7.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples 7 tests 45 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12321
Background blur 21.1 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Face detection 11.2 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.52 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.69 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.64 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 36.7 Gpixels/sec 37.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1728.6 FPS 1703.3 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 5 tests 31 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1467 1346
Stability - 86%
Graphics test 11 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 6549 5948
Graphics test 25 FPS 23 FPS
Section 1 27 FPS 25 FPS
Section 2 25 FPS 23 FPS
Section 3 22 FPS 20 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
17957
Web score 24385 14034
Video editing score 7667 6661
Data manipulation score 11708 13175
Photo editing score 37896 23584
Writing score 22929 17637
Phones tested 2 models 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 8450
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> AndroSidGeekbench 7 GPU9846
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> AndroSidGeekbench 7 GPU9347
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-27 -> AndroSidGeekbench 7 CPU1034 / 5083
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-19 -> AndroSidGeekbench 6 GPU12587
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-08-19 -> AndroSidGeekbench 6 CPU1612 / 6210
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-01 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu 122257137
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Gelo)AnTuTu 122223623
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Abdul)AnTuTu 122149140
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Kkk)AnTuTu 122149090
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-25 (ะ”ะธะผั‡ะธะบัƒั)AnTuTu 122071934

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 8450 and Dimensity 8400

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.25 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
1x 3.25 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3250 MHz 3250 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 6 MB 6 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 MP7 Mali-G720 MP7
Architecture 5th gen 5th gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 7 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 896 896
FLOPS 2329.6 Gigaflops 2329.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 880 MediaTek NPU 880

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5170 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2025 December 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number - MT6899, MT6899Z
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 8450 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - โ€œDimensity 8400 Ultraโ€ is the same chip as โ€œDimensity 8400โ€ but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
381 (52.3%)
348 (47.7%)
Total votes: 729

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8400 and Dimensity 8450, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Fuck May 23, 2026 at 08:36 PM
Lol they did copy paste
0 Reply
Avatar
D8450 User October 11, 2025 at 07:37 PM
damn! D8450 is way better in performance stability and battery life than D8400. test it on OPPO Reno14 Pro vs Xiaomi 15T. OPPO Reno14 Pro got 15 hours for daily usage, while Xiaomi 15T got 9 hours for daily usage.
+9 Reply
Avatar
a technician November 12, 2025 at 11:19 AM
theres a difference as the software for xiaomi and oppo is different. to make a fair comparision, you should use both phones with xiaomi's android 15 and play a 4k video in youtube and compare the battery drain
+21 Reply
Avatar
Blaster July 12, 2025 at 04:15 PM
Meditek is best in mid range no compitition they kill all processor but still suck lack of power upgrade it's the same as previous ๐Ÿ˜ญ.Why mediatek why this monopoly ๐Ÿ˜ญ
+21 Reply
Avatar
ำฦ›SฦฌEฦฆ June 21, 2025 at 06:53 AM
Can someone please tell what's the difference? I checked the whole page and every single specification of both the chips are same, What's the difference??
+65 Reply
Avatar
blud July 22, 2025 at 03:39 PM
You can see in the note, they said 8450 is the same chip as 8400, just changed something for better thermals and sustained performance.
+15 Reply
Avatar
Xero August 1, 2025 at 03:34 PM
blud, Are you idiot? It says 8400 ultra is same as 8400 not 8450 8450 is a better SOC than 8400 and first of all it comes in 8350 series
+9 Reply
Avatar
Raito November 5, 2025 at 03:38 PM
They are the same they both give the same performance just that 850 is on more phones and some of those phones have better cooling systems so the 8450 perform slightly better that the 8400 ultra. Meaning they both are the same if you find 2 phones with those SOCs pick based on other specs
+1 Reply
Avatar
fuuk2 June 13, 2025 at 05:19 PM
Rebranding in 6 months. Well done MediaTek, I still can't see the difference.
+12 Reply
Avatar
LGs June 20, 2025 at 07:14 PM
But 8450 is successor 8350 no 8400.. 8500 is successor 8400. But no release.
+9 Reply
Avatar
Fuuk8 July 3, 2025 at 01:30 PM
Everything same, MediaTek is renaming the processor every time. Just go to Snapdragon: better cooling, performance, long time stability, etc.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Xero August 1, 2025 at 03:36 PM
Fuuk8, Are you sure? I had G90T Helio and now I have 7 gen 3 branded as efficient but both Processor heats alot and 7 gen3 even have frame drops
+9 Reply
fuuk1 May 19, 2025 at 07:45 PM
Geekbench GPU compute score for 8450?
+94 Reply