Dimensity 9300 Plus vs A17 Pro

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus (Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12) with the older 6-core Apple A17 Pro (Apple A17 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
  • Performs 86% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 60%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2348K vs 1467K
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A17 Pro
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • 11% higher CPU clock speed (3780 vs 3400 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2348248
1467470
CPU 703826 374357
GPU 790915 463612
Memory 326393 184670
UX 527114 444831
Total score 2348248 1467470
Samples [94 tests] [21 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A17 Pro +32%
2969
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 300.2 MB/sec 254.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 204.3 pages/sec 166 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 254.8 Mpixels/sec 180.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 161.7 images/sec 178.7 images/sec
HDR 239.3 Mpixels/sec 240.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 25.8 images/sec 26.7 images/sec
Photo processing 69 images/sec 77.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.77 Mpixels/sec 7.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples 38 tests 32 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A17 Pro +84%
28057
Background blur 26.8 images/sec 55.5 images/sec
Face detection 12 images/sec 65.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.69 Gpixels/sec 0.8 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.81 Gpixels/sec 1.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.84 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 30.5 Gpixels/sec 87.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3146.5 FPS 3313.9 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 26 tests 22 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1391
Score 1831 1391
Stability 91% 71%
Graphics test 14 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
6089
Score 7559 6089
Stability - 73%
Graphics test 29 FPS 23 FPS
Section 1 32 FPS 29 FPS
Section 2 29 FPS 23 FPS
Section 3 24 FPS 16 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
3655
Score 5071 3655
Stability - 63%
Graphics test 30 FPS 21 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12141 -
Video editing score 5576 -
Data manipulation score 12937 -
Photo editing score 29738 -
Writing score 22352 -
Phones tested 11 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Purushotam Prajapat)AnTuTu 122403705
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 -> NFS6410AnTuTu 122626976
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (ThΓ nh)AnTuTu 122400294
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-17 (NK808)AnTuTu 122667628
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (TuαΊ₯n Nguyα»…πŸ‡»πŸ‡³)AnTuTu 122637244
Apple A17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (podsolnuh)AnTuTu 111357765
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111599694
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (elio)AnTuTu 111445771
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (human)Geekbench 6 GPU26734
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (human)Geekbench 6 CPU2892 / 7293

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9300 Plus and A17 Pro

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 3.78 GHz – Everest
4x 2.11 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3400 MHz 3780 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 22.7 billion 19 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7.3 W 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Apple A17 GPU
Architecture 5th gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 12 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1536 768
FLOPS 3993.6 Gigaflops 2147.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 790 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5T LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 1290 x 2796
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T830 Snapdragon X70
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7900 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2024 September 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6989, MT6989W/TCZA APL1V02
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
650 (91.4%)
61 (8.6%)
Total votes: 711

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A17 Pro and Dimensity 9300 Plus, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
LGs December 28, 2024 at 06:25 AM
I think you should put a note under the 3dmark performance score saying 3dmark limits Iphones to 60 fps
+8 Reply
Avatar
Harfel Westcott August 6, 2024 at 12:32 PM
I think the answer here is obvious apple lost to mediatek and I don't doubt some given chipset can beat even snapdragon, And I can easily state that this chipset is currently the most powerful in the world.
+73 Reply