Apple A17 Pro

Apple A17 Pro
  • GPU: Apple A17 GPU
  • Cores: 6
  • Clock: 3780 MHz
Apple A17 Pro – an 6-core chipset that was announced on September 12, 2023, and is manufactured using a 3-nanometer process technology. It has 2 cores Everest at 3780 MHz and 4 cores Sawtooth at 2110 MHz.

Review

CPU Performance
82
Gaming Performance
59
Battery life
96
NanoReview Score
77
Compare Apple A17 Pro with other SoCs

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Apple A17 Pro
1467470
CPU 374357
GPU 463612
Memory 184670
UX 444831
Total score 1467470

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2969
Multi-Core Score
7599
Asset compression 254.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 166 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 180.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 178.7 images/sec
HDR 240.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 26.7 images/sec
Photo processing 77.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 7.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples 32 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
28057
Background blur 55.5 images/sec
Face detection 65.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.8 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 87.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3313.9 FPS
API Metal
Samples 22 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1391
Score 1391
Stability 71%
Graphics test 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
6089
Score 6089
Stability 73%
Graphics test 23 FPS
Section 1 29 FPS
Section 2 23 FPS
Section 3 16 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
3655
Score 3655
Stability 63%
Graphics test 21 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Kuan.28)AnTuTu 111752198
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (podsolnuh)AnTuTu 111357765
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111599694
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (elio)AnTuTu 111445771
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (human)Geekbench 6 GPU26734
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (human)Geekbench 6 CPU2892 / 7293
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (human)Geekbench 6 CPU2892 / 7293
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-26 (Desss)AnTuTu 111323415

Smartphones

Click on the device name to view detailed information
Phones with A17 ProAnTuTu v11
1. Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max1467470
2. Apple iPhone 15 Pro1452754

Specifications

Detailed specifications of the A17 Pro SoC with Apple A17 GPU graphics

CPU

Architecture 2x 3.78 GHz – Everest
4x 2.11 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 6
Frequency 3780 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache 256 KB
L2 cache 16 MB
Process 3 nanometers
Transistor count 19 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Apple A17 GPU
Architecture Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1398 MHz
Pipelines 6
Shading units 128
Total shaders 768
FLOPS 2147.2 Gigaflops

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type NVMe
Max display resolution 1290 x 2796
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X70
4G support LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2023
Class Flagship
Model number APL1V02
Successor - Apple A19 Pro

Comments

🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Ibogaine May 20, 2026 at 04:59 AM
My gpu score was lower than average despite cooling the phone. It was 210k Antutu gpu while total was 1.4 million
0 Reply
PocoX7Users March 30, 2026 at 02:40 PM
Can you update this CPU please? I dont think its worser than A16 Bionic. Also, why "gaming points" that lowered? A17 Pro isnt that bad at end of the day. This at least deserves like 85-87 gaming points. But, ur choice.
0 Reply
Avatar
ken April 18, 2026 at 08:24 PM
its probably apple lowering the cpu power to prevent overheat in everyday use as this iphone 15 pro was the first using titanium, it had a LOT of heat problems when it launched
0 Reply
Avatar
Duy Dang July 26, 2025 at 01:34 AM
The A17 Pro chip delivers the best performance with iOS 18.5, so those using the iPhone 15 Pro should consider sticking with this version. I just tested it, the Antutu score reached over 1.8 million; Geekbench single-core is 2981, and multi-core is 7641. There's no temperature issues compared to previous versions.
+13 Reply
Avatar
Alif October 24, 2024 at 02:50 AM
Dear admin A17 pro single core score is 2992 and multi core is 7904 please correct it πŸ™‚
0 Reply
Serhii October 24, 2024 at 06:03 AM
Thank you for a comment!
0 Reply
Avatar
Shubham September 29, 2024 at 07:36 AM
I have a question. If this processor has 97 ratings in battery life, then which CPU has the 100 ratings?
+5 Reply
Avatar
Rosegold August 11, 2024 at 10:42 AM
The Apple iPhone 15 pro max has 3 nanometer that is why it's the fastest chip ever in a mobile phone The only device that can beat it is ipad pro m4 it has a 4.4ghz clock speed
+24 Reply
Avatar
Khaos August 25, 2024 at 03:09 PM
Sorry to interrupt, but please take note M4 is a chip specifically made for MacBook hence why it can handle clock speeds above 4ghz. If we're talking about mobile chips, however (as a whole, including android), then apologies to bear the bad news, but Apple has been dethroned
+30 Reply
Avatar
Dana jamal December 12, 2023 at 05:33 PM
Oh my God, the 3.78Ghz speed is insane! There's nothing that can beat the power of Apple's A17 Pro. Even in single-core performance, it scores 2910 points. It's an incredible demonstration of speed and power, or whatever you want to call it. I don't know, it's just unbeatable!
+72 Reply
Avatar
Daine Ramos Quitco January 8, 2024 at 04:48 PM
The performance of the Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max is nearly identical to the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, despite scoring over 7,000 in Geekbench 6's multi-core and 2,900 in single-core tests! Amazing, isn't it?
+73 Reply
Avatar
Rosegold August 11, 2024 at 10:37 AM
Try apple IPad pro M4
+1 Reply
Avatar
Pepin September 3, 2024 at 08:13 PM
Rosegold, You are comparing a Snapdragon 8 SOC wich consume between 5 & 10W at max VS M4 wicu consumes 15 to 20W. Is not the same. Compare Apples with Apples. A17 vs 8 Gen 2 both 2023 and 8 Gen 2 is better.
+2 Reply
Avatar
Kmm February 2, 2025 at 12:04 PM
Pepin, No' A17 Pro better than 8 gen 2
+5 Reply
Avatar
Aiolus October 4, 2025 at 05:44 AM
Pepin, A17 Pro Is Better Than 8 gen 2 its between The performance of 8 Gen 2 and 3.
0 Reply
Avatar
Zhinazhu November 20, 2023 at 03:15 AM
If this continues, Apple will lose to Exynos.
+88 Reply
Avatar
Anonymous April 23, 2024 at 10:44 PM
Lmao no it won't, apple is way ahead of that failing chip
+18 Reply
Avatar
King Miracle. August 3, 2024 at 09:05 AM
Anonymous, Nope. Apple has already lost.
+8 Reply
Avatar
Danshi November 10, 2023 at 01:16 PM
A17 Pro: Scores 1.6 million on Antutu. IQOO 12 with 8G3: Casually beats it with a 2.2 million score for less than half the price! We have a winner!
+116 Reply
Avatar
Altaf October 9, 2023 at 03:31 PM
Forget everything for a moment, let's just appreciate how awesome and clean this site is!
+95 Reply
Avatar
Bereket January 16, 2024 at 04:14 PM
FR, No site can beat this.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Hwing September 23, 2023 at 03:48 AM
I'd argue that Antutu V10 allows for a direct comparison between iOS and Android. In V9, the Apple A16 Bionic scored just over 900K, but now it's over 1400K in V10. After the shift to Antutu V10, the A16 Bionic scored over 1400K and the A17 Pro surpassed 1500K. The A17 Pro and the MTK 9200 Plus have nearly identical scores in Antutu V10. In Geekbench 6, the Apple Bionic series tends to score higher, but in Geekbench 5, the A16 and 9200 Plus have almost identical scores for both single and multi-core tests. So, it seems Geekbench updates their scores more frequently for Apple iOS.
+53 Reply
Avatar
Reptalica August 30, 2024 at 11:00 AM
Apple has a better CPU core, and Geekbench is a CPU test. 3DMark is a GPU test and let me tell you, Apple scores 1/2 of the 8th gen 3.
0 Reply
Avatar
Crow September 17, 2023 at 06:51 PM
I hope Qualcomm outperforms Apple this year. The iPhone is always at the top every year. Come on!
+65 Reply
Avatar
Unknown September 18, 2023 at 02:59 AM
iPhone consistently strikes hefty deals with TSMC to ensure they don't produce processors for any other company, especially those similar to iPhone's chips. For instance, this year, a contract was inked with TSMC to prevent them from manufacturing 3-nanometer processors for any other company. While it's a smart strategy for Apple to stand out with its powerful processors, it does come across as somewhat selfish. However, if Samsung advances in the processor industry as rumored, neither Apple nor TSMC will be able to halt its progress. And Exynos processors could reclaim their past glory.
+29 Reply
Avatar
Kai September 18, 2023 at 01:22 PM
I believe it will be extremely challenging for them for the next 1-2 generations, especially in terms of raw CPU performance. Apple has consistently outperformed with fewer cores for the past decade! I'm an Android fan and I value open source, openness, and customization. However, I genuinely appreciate the level of optimization that Apple brings to their products and apps. It's truly a sight to behold.
+23 Reply
Avatar
Shonen September 25, 2023 at 05:21 PM
Qualcomm's already surpassed Apple in GPU since 8+ gen 1 which came out last year. A17 pro is only just catching up to 8 gen 2's GPU so it's only in CPU that Apple is ahead. Can't wait to see what performance Qualcomm will bring next year with the 8 gen 3 (1x cortex X4, 3x cortex A720 & 4x A520).
+19 Reply
Avatar
ethylene October 2, 2023 at 12:38 AM
While the next Snapdragon 8 may be able to tie with Apple A17 in multi-core, we'll have to wait for next year when Nuvia cores arrive.
+1 Reply
Avatar
dddk May 16, 2024 at 04:27 AM
Unknown, Fuck, damn. Apple's chips are the best forever.
+2 Reply
Avatar
Bekir May 30, 2024 at 10:45 PM
Qualcomm had never outperformed Apple, and sadly, I don't think they could ever surpass them. The year was 2015 when Apple was surpassed for the last time. It happened with the Galaxy S6's SoC, Exynos 7420. It was the first 14nm SoC around the world. And not only in mobile processors but in the entire area of microprocessors. It was groundbreaking. At that time, Samsung was actually better than TSMC at producing microprocessors. I believe that was the biggest reason why Samsung was able to be ahead of the others because there was no TSMC to produce great SoCs for everyone.
+2 Reply
Avatar
Zen July 23, 2024 at 03:06 AM
Bekir, Lmaoo, what are you even talking about? Still denying it huh?
0 Reply
Avatar
Tech September 16, 2023 at 04:52 PM
Geekbench 5 is about 6200 in multi-core and single core is about 2200.
+24 Reply
Avatar
Monpo September 19, 2023 at 02:42 PM
Geekbench Updated to Geekbench 6. Therefore, we can call the platform the Apple Bench. It's the worst update that's ever happened. Why is it that whenever Android processors are stronger or as powerful as Apple processors, the platform updates and supports Apple processors and makes them the best? Therefore, I always prefer AnTuTu.
+41 Reply
Avatar
Smarterthanyou February 17, 2024 at 09:45 AM
Monpo, Aka you only like benchmarks when android scores higher. You’re a walking hipacrit. Textbook even.
+1 Reply
Avatar
XDphoner May 6, 2024 at 11:42 AM
Monpo, Antutu is not a good refence in order to compare scores from different plataforms as android and iOS, due to the fact that those plataforms have obvious differences regarding the kernel and development language, as the case of APIs of the GPUs (Metal on iOS, and Vulkan on Android) so even though both do the same task, they behave different, and in consecuence need to evaluate differenty, something that even antutu itself recognises it https://www.antutu.com/en/doc/119646.htm
+7 Reply