Tensor G4 vs A17 Pro

We compared the 8-core Google Tensor G4 (Mali-G715 MP7) with the older 6-core Apple A17 Pro (Apple A17 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G4
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Shows better (up to 4%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1519K vs 1467K
Pros of Apple A17 Pro
  • Higher GPU frequency (~49%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Performs 27% better in floating-point computations
  • 22% higher CPU clock speed (3780 vs 3100 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
vs

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Tensor G4 +4%
1519937
1467470
CPU 536742 374357
GPU 414930 463612
Memory 215572 184670
UX 352693 444831
Total score 1519937 1467470
Samples [25 tests] [21 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1707
A17 Pro +74%
2969
Multi-Core Score
4431
A17 Pro +71%
7599
Asset compression 177.3 MB/sec 254.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 134 pages/sec 166 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 157 Mpixels/sec 180.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 122 images/sec 178.7 images/sec
HDR 128.3 Mpixels/sec 240.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 15.8 images/sec 26.7 images/sec
Photo processing 39.2 images/sec 77.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.65 Mpixels/sec 7.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples 11 tests 32 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
8744
A17 Pro +221%
28057
Background blur 13.4 images/sec 55.5 images/sec
Face detection 8.51 images/sec 65.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.8 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.3 Gpixels/sec 1.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.36 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 26.4 Gpixels/sec 87.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1273.7 FPS 3313.9 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 9 tests 22 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
1049
A17 Pro +33%
1391
Score 1049 1391
Stability 84% 71%
Graphics test 8 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
n/a
6089
Score - 6089
Stability - 73%
Graphics test - 23 FPS
Section 1 - 29 FPS
Section 2 - 23 FPS
Section 3 - 16 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
n/a
3655
Score - 3655
Stability - 63%
Graphics test - 21 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13174
n/a
Web score 10521 -
Video editing score 7569 -
Data manipulation score 14718 -
Photo editing score 21074 -
Writing score 15880 -
Phones tested 4 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor G4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 -> Oleg 16 cmAnTuTu 111423579
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (feraroof43)AnTuTu 111626655
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Leif)AnTuTu 111590049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Kazin)AnTuTu 111723964
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (123)Geekbench 6 GPU8744
Apple A17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111996792
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Kuan.28)AnTuTu 111752198
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (podsolnuh)AnTuTu 111357765
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111599694
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (elio)AnTuTu 111445771

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tensor G4 and A17 Pro

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 3.78 GHz – Everest
4x 2.11 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3100 MHz 3780 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 16 MB
Process 4 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count - 19 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G715 MP7 Apple A17 GPU
Architecture Valhall 4th gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 940 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 7 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 896 768
FLOPS 1684.4 Gigaflops 2147.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 1290 x 2796
Max camera resolution - 1x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400c Snapdragon X70
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed - Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 6.0 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced August 2024 September 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS401 (S5P9875) APL1V02
Successor - Google Tensor G5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
64 (29.9%)
150 (70.1%)
Total votes: 214

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A17 Pro and Tensor G4, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!