Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Dimensity 8400

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus (with Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 graphics) and Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size than the Dimensity 8400
  • Shows significantly better (up to 48%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2874K vs 1948K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Supports 25% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 68.2 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)
  • 15% higher CPU clock speed (3730 vs 3250 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2874956
1948428
CPU 869347 623766
GPU 1015558 596540
Memory 357663 331200
UX 632388 396922
Total score 2874956 1948428
Samples [171 tests] [313 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 359.5 MB/sec 248.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 252.5 pages/sec 189.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 300.4 Mpixels/sec 189.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 223.1 images/sec 111.1 images/sec
HDR 267.2 Mpixels/sec 166.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 33.2 images/sec 19.8 images/sec
Photo processing 78.2 images/sec 58 images/sec
Ray tracing 9.25 Mpixels/sec 7.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples 20 tests 45 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 49 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Face detection 28.1 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.94 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.21 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.5 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 72.5 Gpixels/sec 37.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3826.1 FPS 1703.3 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 17 tests 31 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 2377 1346
Stability 77% 86%
Graphics test 18 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 10715 5948
Graphics test 41 FPS 23 FPS
Section 1 45 FPS 25 FPS
Section 2 41 FPS 23 FPS
Section 3 36 FPS 20 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 5777 -
Graphics test 34 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 12340 14034
Video editing score 7385 6661
Data manipulation score 14039 13175
Photo editing score 40750 23584
Writing score 27541 17637
Phones tested 10 models 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (Anand)AnTuTu 122939313
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Syed Shahzaib SubhaniAnTuTu 123103556
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> la.mih0AnTuTu 122649888
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 -> kannzeraAnTuTu 112643488
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-15 (k)AnTuTu 112643488
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Xann)AnTuTu 122143962
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (AYS)AnTuTu 122192420
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (tadslj)AnTuTu 111988365
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (JenKenny)AnTuTu 112063774
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-20 (POCOMAN)AnTuTu 122112771

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9400 Plus and Dimensity 8400

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.73 GHz – Cortex-X925
3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725
Cores 8 8
Frequency 3730 MHz 3250 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 12 MB 6 MB
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G720 MP7
Architecture Valhall 5th gen 5th gen
GPU frequency 1612 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 12 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1536 896
FLOPS 4952.1 Gigaflops 2329.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek NPU 880
NPU theoretical performance 50 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced April 2025 December 2024
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number MT6991, MT6991Z/TCZA MT6899, MT6899Z
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus official site MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - β€œDimensity 8400 Ultra” is the same chip as β€œDimensity 8400” but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
90 (89.1%)
11 (10.9%)
Total votes: 101

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8400 and Dimensity 9400 Plus, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!