Dimensity 9500 vs Tensor G5

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (with Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 graphics) and Google Tensor G5 (PowerVR DXT-48-1536). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9500
  • Performs 3.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.4x) AnTuTu 11 score – 3760K vs 1549K
  • Has 8 MB larger L3 cache size than the Tensor G5
  • Higher GPU frequency (~56%)
  • Supports 25% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 68.2 GB/s)
  • 11% higher CPU clock speed (4210 vs 3780 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
3760662
1549798
CPU 1048345 734567
GPU 1432351 183228
Memory 476680 222379
UX 803286 409624
Total score 3760662 1549798
Samples [119 tests] [16 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
3352
2305
Multi-Core Score
10402
6054
Asset compression 397.3 MB/sec 281.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 292.7 pages/sec 162.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 328.1 Mpixels/sec 207.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 234.3 images/sec 149.5 images/sec
HDR 328.1 Mpixels/sec 151.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 40.9 images/sec 24.4 images/sec
Photo processing 109.9 images/sec 46.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 10.3 Mpixels/sec 6.79 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 8 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
25501
4116
Background blur 47.2 images/sec 4.77 images/sec
Face detection 26.1 images/sec 2.41 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.78 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.31 Gpixels/sec 0.27 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.68 Gpixels/sec 0.2 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.31 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 91.9 Gpixels/sec 12.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3324.6 FPS 634.9 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 14 tests 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
3119
1012
Score 3119 1012
Stability 57% 96%
Graphics test 23 FPS 7 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 13319 -
Graphics test 51 FPS -
Section 1 55 FPS -
Section 2 52 FPS -
Section 3 43 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Tensor G5 +1%
15332
Web score 14375 17237
Video editing score 5995 7203
Data manipulation score 12159 14036
Photo editing score 34571 24584
Writing score 22695 20213
Phones tested 4 models 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-09 (hi)AnTuTu 123462409
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 -> KuJIbKaAnTuTu 123491535
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Elvin)AnTuTu 113330144
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (SillyKilly)AnTuTu 123461876
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (ISLAH AMINE)AnTuTu 123544347
Google Tensor G5
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Dolbaeb)AnTuTu 121549159
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 -> PixeluserAnTuTu 111536042
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 -> bangAnTuTu 111719659
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 -> bangCPU Throttle74%
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 -> bangGeekbench 6 GPU4116

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9500 and Tensor G5

CPU

Architecture 1x 4.21 GHz – C1-Ultra
3x 3.5 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 2.7 GHz – C1-Pro
1x 3.78 GHz – Cortex-X4
5x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 8 8
Frequency 4210 MHz 3780 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 192 KB -
L2 cache 2 MB -
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 9 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 PowerVR DXT-48-1536
Architecture Valhall 5th gen -
GPU frequency 1716 MHz 1100 MHz
Pipelines 12 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1536 768
FLOPS 5271.5 Gigaflops 1689.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.4
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Yes
NPU theoretical performance 100 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 85.3 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution - 3840 x 2400
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Exynos 5400c
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 10700 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced September 2025 August 2025
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6993 GS501
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9500 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
134 (90.5%)
14 (9.5%)
Total votes: 148

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G5 and Dimensity 9500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
SSS August 19, 2026 at 04:11 AM
Tensor is pure garbage and they want premium price for it
0 Reply
Avatar
Lmaooo May 8, 2026 at 12:16 PM
Pixel fanboys really enjoy getting shafted by google lmaooooo
+2 Reply
Avatar
tg5 January 1, 2026 at 02:49 AM
shiity tensor has been obliterated.
+4 Reply
Avatar
lulz December 11, 2025 at 01:46 PM
Who are the 3 complete and total morons would picked the G5 over the 9500?
+3 Reply
Avatar
MyMy September 30, 2025 at 12:28 AM
How could you expect good user experience during the 7 years Android update from Google when their latest and greatest SoC performed this BAD?
+4 Reply