Snapdragon 680 vs A13 Bionic

We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (Adreno 610) with the older 6-core Apple A13 Bionic (Apple A13 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
Pros of Apple A13 Bionic
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2.6x) AnTuTu 11 score – 1101K vs 424K
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 101% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 17 GB/s)
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2650 vs 2400 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~10%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A13 Bionic +160%
1101851
CPU 185604 296803
GPU 26544 301818
Memory 114814 149834
UX 97254 353396
Total score 424216 1101851
Samples [82 tests] [47 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A13 Bionic +325%
1749
Multi-Core Score
A13 Bionic +180%
3989
Asset compression 85.7 MB/sec 146.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 43.2 pages/sec 90.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 59.4 Mpixels/sec 103.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 15.7 images/sec 85.1 images/sec
HDR 49.8 Mpixels/sec 130.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 2.98 images/sec 13.9 images/sec
Photo processing 11.3 images/sec 38.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.59 Mpixels/sec 4.69 Mpixels/sec
Samples 35 tests 12 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A13 Bionic +3895%
13902
Background blur 0.32 images/sec 20.3 images/sec
Face detection 0.16 images/sec 25.6 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.44 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.04 Gpixels/sec 0.68 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.77 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 1.48 Gpixels/sec 45.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 26.6 FPS 1367.9 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 20 tests 8 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 2564
Stability - 74%
Graphics test - 10 FPS
Section 1 - 12 FPS
Section 2 - 10 FPS
Section 3 - 7 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A13 Bionic +1063%
2001
Score 172 2001
Stability 97% 70%
Graphics test 1 FPS 11 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 7531 -
Video editing score 4072 -
Data manipulation score 6097 -
Photo editing score 14785 -
Writing score 8535 -
Phones tested 16 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[Medium]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 23 FPS
[Low]
60 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends 65 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 62 FPS
[Medium]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 26 FPS
[Low]
59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 54 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
1080 x 2400
Apple iPhone 11 Pro
828 x 1792
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Arsts)AnTuTu 12516449
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> Oleg 16 cmAnTuTu 11426265
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-16 (ZION)AnTuTu 12514393
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-15 (Raick)AnTuTu 12486423
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (Simran)AnTuTu 12478141
Apple A13 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Π•Π²Π³Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ :))AnTuTu 111178640
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (nuri)AnTuTu 111133524
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Ianzzzz)AnTuTu 111090244
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-07 (Ianzzzz)AnTuTu 111090244
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (Feonton)AnTuTu 11915377

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 680 and A13 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
2x 2.65 GHz – Lightning
4x 1.6 GHz – Thunder
Cores 8 6
Frequency 2400 MHz 2650 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 8 MB
Process 6 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 8.5 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 610 Apple A13 GPU
Architecture Adreno 600 Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1114 MHz 1230 MHz
Pipelines 1 4
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 128 256
FLOPS 285.2 Gigaflops 629.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 5 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 4 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 NVMe
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2688 x 1242
Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP -
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X11 -
4G support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 18
5G support No No
Download speed Up to 390 Mbps Up to 1200 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced October 2021 September 2019
Class Low end Flagship
Model number SM6225 APL1W85
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 official site -
Successor - - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
33 (19.6%)
135 (80.4%)
Total votes: 168

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A13 Bionic and Snapdragon 680, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!