Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 6300 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 6300

Snapdragon 695
VS
Dimensity 6300
Snapdragon 695
Dimensity 6300

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (6)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 3.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 11 score – 592K vs 528K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6300
  • Higher GPU frequency (~28%)
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Dimensity 6300

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695 +12%
592015
Dimensity 6300
528398
CPU 237904 224355
GPU 56314 45549
Memory 136317 104424
UX 161480 154070
Total score 592015 528398
Samples [83 tests] [46 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 100.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 48.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 70.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 38.3 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 62.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 5.73 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 19.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.92 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 23 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 2.03 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 0.96 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 4.05 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 243.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests 18 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 151
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 1 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 11337
Video editing score 3911 5070
Data manipulation score 8663 7132
Photo editing score 18151 25038
Writing score 13129 11440
Phones tested 21 models 12 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 -
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 -
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 -
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 -
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Add View all (113)
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-29 (Gremmar)AnTuTu 12630572
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (JJ)AnTuTu 12529486
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (JJ)Geekbench 7 CPU650 / 1924
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (Gremmar)AnTuTu 12620457
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Gremmar)AnTuTu 12598333
Add View all (41)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 6300

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 2 MB
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1072 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 64
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 137.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 17 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 3300 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 April 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6835, MT6835T, MT6835V/TZB
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 6300 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - MediaTek Dimensity 6400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
603 (60%)
402 (40%)
Total votes: 1005

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1)
2. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4)
3. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (9)
4. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
5. MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (10)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (16)
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 6300 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Nerd2Dmax September 22, 2025 at 02:59 AM
A78 is two gens away from A76, therefore there are core configuration changes made there. But kinda small difference as per benchmark in single and multicore though..
+7 Reply
Avatar
Robin sins September 9, 2024 at 03:53 PM
It's 6300 slight better in everything but in gpu it's 695
+75 Reply
Avatar
Big December 11, 2024 at 08:57 AM
You can’t be right, 695 is based on A78 core, which is far better than A76 in 6300.
+36 Reply
Avatar
Mrp March 9, 2025 at 03:28 PM
Big, So what is the difference between A76 2.2ghz and A78 2.2ghz (i know they aren't at same speed but i asked in that way to make a fair comparison
+12 Reply
Avatar
Samuel28 July 15, 2025 at 09:40 AM
Mrp, They have difference in terms of compute processing power and also power efficiency But comparing a 2.4 ghz cortex a76 and a 2.2 ghz cortex a78 had similar or small difference in computing power but had differences by seconds of compute
+3 Reply
Avatar
Jon Doe November 26, 2025 at 06:13 AM
Mrp, A78 at 2.2GHz is much better than A76 at 2.4GHz it has almost 15% IPC improvement
+9 Reply
EnglishРусский