Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 7020 – what's better?

Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 7020

Snapdragon 695
VS
Dimensity 7020
Snapdragon 695
Dimensity 7020

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 7020 (IMG BXM-8-256). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (8)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
  • Performs 77% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7020
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~13%)
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score – 644K vs 592K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Dimensity 7020

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695
592015
Dimensity 7020 +9%
644203
CPU 237904 247156
GPU 56314 53263
Memory 136317 142748
UX 161480 201036
Total score 592015 644203
Samples [83 tests] [14 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 113.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 60.1 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 80.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 44.3 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 71.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 6.61 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 20.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 2.97 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 15 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 1.21 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 0.75 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 1.92 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 109.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 23 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Snapdragon 695
9496
Dimensity 7020 +23%
11645
Web score 9704 11480
Video editing score 3911 5240
Data manipulation score 8663 8591
Photo editing score 18151 28967
Writing score 13129 16245
Phones tested 21 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]		 -
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]		 -
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]		 -
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400		 -
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
Add View all (113)
MediaTek Dimensity 7020
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Murilo)AnTuTu 11585043
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (SANDER)AnTuTu 11688346
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Anonim)AnTuTu 11735101
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (PhosperX)AnTuTu 11662065
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-02 (asmire)AnTuTu 11649794
Add View all (22)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 7020

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Transistor count - 10 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 IMG BXM-8-256
Architecture Adreno 600 PowerVR IMG GPU
GPU frequency 840 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 8
Shading units 128 16
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 5
Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 May 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 -
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7020 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1492 (29.3%)
3607 (70.7%)
Total votes: 5099

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (16)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (31)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (19)
4. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
5. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus (1)
6. MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs MediaTek Helio G99 (7)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (1)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
9. MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (4)
10. MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7020 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
M Hasan July 30, 2024 at 04:42 AM
Long time use for who is batter?
+127 Reply
Avatar
Stratospheric May 31, 2024 at 11:22 PM
Do you like the screen on your devices? It doesn't bother you?
+22 Reply
Avatar
LPP May 21, 2024 at 02:26 PM
G84 5G user here, in games snap 695 with 8+8Gb ram = Good fps.
+46 Reply
Avatar
Marko April 13, 2024 at 08:02 AM
I have a Motorola G54 Power with 12/256 GB. Antutu shows a score of 462K, and I love it! It's great for gaming because it has an overall good processor.
+48 Reply
Avatar
Johan April 12, 2024 at 01:24 AM
Same here, i am Moto G54 user, D7020 is good but it uses ten years old Imagination GPU 2K 30. GPU is just right for some games. I don't see same errors like Adreno and Mali GPUs.
+22 Reply
Avatar
Gamer March 8, 2024 at 05:21 PM
Motorola G54 is good for its price.
+180 Reply
Avatar
Cheezas January 9, 2024 at 07:34 AM
There are some inaccuracies. The D7020 is HDR capable, and as such, it supports 4K 30 video playback as well. This has been confirmed using a Moto G54. Furthermore, LPDDR4X RAM is also supported.
+410 Reply
Avatar
Beast March 5, 2024 at 01:32 PM
Hello, I'm a user of the Moto G54 12+256 GB variant, and I am experiencing unfavorable 4K video playback. The system is automatically changing the resolution to 240p and locking it there.
+262 Reply
EnglishРусский