Snapdragon 695 vs Dimensity 7300

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Mali-G615 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Shows significantly better (up to 49%) AnTuTu 11 score – 879K vs 592K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~25%)
  • Performs 25% better in floating-point computations
  • 14% higher CPU clock speed (2500 vs 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
879714
CPU 237904 320191
GPU 56314 128437
Memory 136317 164451
UX 161480 266635
Total score 592015 879714
Samples [83 tests] [311 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 166 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 68.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 114.8 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 53.4 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 102.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 10.7 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 25.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 4.62 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 4.57 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 2.52 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 4.25 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 439.4 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests 40 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 346
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13626
Web score 9704 13221
Video editing score 3911 6420
Data manipulation score 8663 9644
Photo editing score 18151 35886
Writing score 13129 16658
Phones tested 21 models 22 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ambar Anand)AnTuTu 12704103
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 -> Rimaki58AnTuTu 12728985
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu 11583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)Geekbench 6 CPU917 / 1939
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Антон)AnTuTu 121010952
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Chelik)AnTuTu 121005243
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Keyn)AnTuTu 12994900
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (АлСксСй)AnTuTu 12898347
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Fabricy)Geekbench 7 GPU2511

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 7300

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2500 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 4 MB
Process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G615 MP2
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 4rd gen
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1047 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 536.1 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 655

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 3270 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 June 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 MT6878 MT6878V/ZA MT6878V_A/ZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7300 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 - MediaTek Dimensity 7400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
56 (12.9%)
377 (87.1%)
Total votes: 433

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7300 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Margos January 16, 2025 at 07:35 AM
These two are the most powerful efficient processors ever made , 7300 is best suitable for me .
+42 Reply