Snapdragon 695 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (Adreno 810). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
  • Shows significantly better (up to 65%) AnTuTu 11 score – 975K vs 592K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~37%)
  • Performs 37% better in floating-point computations
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • 5% higher CPU clock speed (2300 vs 2200 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
975254
CPU 237904 366806
GPU 56314 163024
Memory 136317 196787
UX 161480 248637
Total score 592015 975254
Samples [83 tests] [97 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 102.5 MB/sec 148.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 55.1 pages/sec 85 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 72.9 Mpixels/sec 108.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 58.8 images/sec
HDR 61.6 Mpixels/sec 91.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.46 images/sec 11.9 images/sec
Photo processing 19.9 images/sec 27.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.67 Mpixels/sec 4.14 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 17 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 2.26 images/sec 7.28 images/sec
Face detection 0.98 images/sec 3.56 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.09 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.26 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.35 Gpixels/sec 14.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 245.1 FPS 543.9 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 23 tests 12 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 352
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 360 -
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9704 10662
Video editing score 3911 6264
Data manipulation score 8663 9333
Photo editing score 18151 19358
Writing score 13129 13830
Phones tested 21 models 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 66 FPS
[Low]
-
Call of Duty: Mobile 60 FPS
[Low]
-
Fortnite 24 FPS
[Low]
-
Shadowgun Legends 67 FPS
[Low]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 57 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Genshin Impact 19 FPS
[Low]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 42 FPS
[Ultra]
-
Device Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro
1080 x 2400
-
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-17 (Arthur)AnTuTu583738
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-13 (Fernando)AnTuTu584675
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-04 (BatheanThe_)AnTuTu912468
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (Kk)AnTuTu866729
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (Raf Hakobyan)AnTuTu973945
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (Raf Hakobyan)CPU Throttle100%
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Jeo)AnTuTu998878

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Snapdragon 6 Gen 4

CPU

Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
1x 2.3 GHz – Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2200 MHz 2300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
Process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Adreno 810
Architecture Adreno 600 Adreno 800
GPU frequency 840 MHz 1150 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 430.1 Gigaflops 588.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Hexagon

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 1K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 Qualcomm X62 5G
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2900 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1500 Mbps Up to 1600 Mbps
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2021 February 2025
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6375 SM6650
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
9 (11.3%)
71 (88.8%)
Total votes: 80

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!