Snapdragon 855 vs Kirin 980

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (with Adreno 640 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 980 (Mali-G76 MP10). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  • Performs 2.6x better in floating-point computations
  • 9% higher CPU clock speed (2840 vs 2600 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 11 score – 824K vs 736K
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 980
  • Higher GPU frequency (~23%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
824513
736755
CPU 314517 322481
GPU 125449 107109
Memory 150134 146249
UX 234413 160916
Total score 824513 736755
Samples [39 tests] [37 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 980 +5%
2875
Asset compression 126.8 MB/sec 128.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 74.2 pages/sec 75 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 88 Mpixels/sec 97.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 57.7 images/sec 59.9 images/sec
HDR 89.3 Mpixels/sec 85.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.07 images/sec 10.1 images/sec
Photo processing 20.2 images/sec 22.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.06 Mpixels/sec 3.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 29 tests 18 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 980 +35%
3657
Background blur 4.31 images/sec 5.49 images/sec
Face detection 1.84 images/sec 3.47 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.28 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 8.72 Gpixels/sec 12.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 444 FPS 485.7 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 19 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
876
675
Score 876 675
Stability 86% 48%
Graphics test 5 FPS 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
10497
8701
Web score 8813 7820
Video editing score 5956 5774
Data manipulation score 8239 7472
Photo editing score 22485 14221
Writing score 13084 10928
Phones tested 8 models 6 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[Ultra]
56 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 56 FPS
[Ultra]
39 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Ultra]
28 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS
[Ultra]
51 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 57 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
1080 x 2340
Huawei Nova 5T
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Pon)AnTuTu 121038764
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Stanley)AnTuTu 12969794
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Stanley)AnTuTu 11847934
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (pakasraka)AnTuTu 11763477
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-23 (long tran)Geekbench 6 GPU3882
HiSilicon Kirin 980
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Absolute_subzero)AnTuTu 12903849
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Adiit)AnTuTu 12919298
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> DUYNGAnTuTu 12910146
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (DUYNG)AnTuTu 12901546
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Techdude98)AnTuTu 12803419

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and Kirin 980

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2840 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count 6.7 billion 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 640 Mali-G76 MP10
Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 585 MHz 720 MHz
Pipelines 3 10
Shading units 256 24
Total shaders 768 240
FLOPS 898.5 Gigaflops 345.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 690 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 34.13 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3120 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G -
4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 1400 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.0 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced December 2018 August 2018
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8150 -
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 official site HiSilicon Kirin 980 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1288 (42.1%)
1768 (57.9%)
Total votes: 3056

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 980 and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!