Snapdragon 778G vs Kirin 980

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 980 (Mali-G76 MP10). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Performs 63% better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 6%) AnTuTu 11 score – 783K vs 736K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 980
  • Higher GPU frequency (~31%)
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (34.1 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2600 vs 2400 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
783606
736755
CPU 326426 322481
GPU 101452 107109
Memory 119484 146249
UX 236244 160916
Total score 783606 736755
Samples [113 tests] [37 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1017
928
Multi-Core Score
2943
2875
Asset compression 157.1 MB/sec 128.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.7 pages/sec 75 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 113.9 Mpixels/sec 97.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.4 images/sec 59.9 images/sec
HDR 91.1 Mpixels/sec 85.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 10.1 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 22.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.17 Mpixels/sec 3.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 68 tests 18 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 980 +70%
3657
Background blur 3.5 images/sec 5.49 images/sec
Face detection 1.57 images/sec 3.47 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.17 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.28 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.16 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.75 Gpixels/sec 12.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 370.4 FPS 485.7 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 26 tests 11 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 225 -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 686 675
Stability 99% 48%
Graphics test 4 FPS 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
12246
8701
Web score 10945 7820
Video editing score 6994 5774
Data manipulation score 9642 7472
Photo editing score 24463 14221
Writing score 14285 10928
Phones tested 11 models 6 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]
56 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]
39 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]
28 FPS
[High]
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]
51 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400
Huawei Nova 5T
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (deramen)AnTuTu 12880897
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 -> FlopsAnTuTu 12831230
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Bunny)Geekbench 7 GPU1188
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Bunny)Geekbench 7 CPU663 / 2476
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Bunny)Geekbench 7 CPU663 / 2476
HiSilicon Kirin 980
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Absolute_subzero)AnTuTu 12903849
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Adiit)AnTuTu 12919298
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 -> DUYNGAnTuTu 12910146
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (DUYNG)AnTuTu 12901546
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Techdude98)AnTuTu 12803419

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Kirin 980

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
2x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache 2 MB 4 MB
Process 6 nanometers 7 nanometers
Transistor count - 6.9 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Mali-G76 MP10
Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost 3rd gen
GPU frequency 550 MHz 720 MHz
Pipelines 2 10
Shading units 256 24
Total shaders 512 240
FLOPS 563.2 Gigaflops 345.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 Yes

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3120 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X53 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 1400 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced May 2021 August 2018
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number SM7325 -
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site HiSilicon Kirin 980 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
663 (29.6%)
1576 (70.4%)
Total votes: 2239

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 980 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
OpposedScroll75 September 8, 2024 at 01:30 PM
While the Kirin 980's benchmark scores are misleading (in reality, the Kirin 980 performs worse than the SD778G), it's still holding its own in 2024 and is still faster than most budget phones
+34 Reply
Avatar
Oscar September 23, 2023 at 09:27 AM
Krin is truly a king. I still use my Huawei P30 Pro, and it outperforms many other phones in terms of performance. Plus, the camera is amazing.
+96 Reply