Snapdragon 865 vs Kirin 9000

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (with Adreno 650 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 9000 (Mali-G78 MP24). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9000
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~29%)
  • Performs 29% better in floating-point computations
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (3130 vs 2840 MHz)
  • Shows slightly better (up to 10%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1079K vs 978K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Kirin 9000 +10%
1079281
CPU 385127 370173
GPU 148169 275434
Memory 166070 158011
UX 279544 275663
Total score 978910 1079281
Samples [104 tests] Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1262
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 9000 +10%
3507
Asset compression 149.1 MB/sec 146.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 87.2 pages/sec 90.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 125.3 Mpixels/sec 113.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 77 images/sec 71.8 images/sec
HDR 106.3 Mpixels/sec 98.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11 images/sec 11.8 images/sec
Photo processing 32.7 images/sec 29.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.29 Mpixels/sec 4.01 Mpixels/sec
Samples 52 tests 71 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 9000 +83%
7580
Background blur 4.53 images/sec 11.8 images/sec
Face detection 1.97 images/sec 6.39 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.38 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 9.05 Gpixels/sec 28.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 567.3 FPS 1164.8 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 34 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Kirin 9000 +86%
2062
Score 1110 2062
Stability 99% 90%
Graphics test 6 FPS 12 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
11621
7773
Web score 9557 5096
Video editing score 5874 6152
Data manipulation score 8658 6691
Photo editing score 29642 16500
Writing score 14782 8573
Phones tested 14 models -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 60 FPS
[Ultra]
81 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile 61 FPS
[Ultra]
44 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 30 FPS
[Ultra]
29 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS
[Ultra]
51 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 60 FPS
[Ultra]
58 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 59 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
1080 x 2340
Huawei Mate 40 Pro
1344 x 3140
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-19 (pong)AnTuTu 121115179
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 (Tarakane)AnTuTu 11933558
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 -> FenixistarkAnTuTu 121134088
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-05 (Gigante Supremo)AnTuTu 121111940
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-27 (MAPKIS)AnTuTu 121102560
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 865 and Kirin 9000

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77
3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77
4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2840 MHz 3130 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 10.3 billion 15.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 650 Mali-G78 MP24
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 587 MHz 759 MHz
Pipelines 3 24
Shading units 256 32
Total shaders 768 768
FLOPS 901.6 Gigaflops 1165.8 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 698 AI accelerator

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2750 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 44 Gb/s 44 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X55 Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 22 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3000 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Info

Announced December 2019 October 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number SM8250-AB -
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 official site HiSilicon Kirin 9000 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 - HiSilicon Kirin 9000S

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
244 (21.6%)
885 (78.4%)
Total votes: 1129

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9000 and Snapdragon 865, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!