Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Snapdragon 778G vs Dimensity 7050 – what's better?

Snapdragon 778G vs Dimensity 7050

Snapdragon 778G
VS
Dimensity 7050
Snapdragon 778G
Dimensity 7050

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 7050 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (13)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
  • Performs 2.3x better in floating-point computations
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7050
  • Higher GPU frequency (~73%)
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2600 vs 2400 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 778G
vs
Dimensity 7050

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 778G
783606
Dimensity 7050 +3%
806012
CPU 326426 310680
GPU 101452 80663
Memory 119484 176922
UX 236244 237747
Total score 783606 806012
Samples [113 tests] [29 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 157.1 MB/sec 117.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 70.7 pages/sec 61.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 113.9 Mpixels/sec 88 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.4 images/sec 44.8 images/sec
HDR 91.1 Mpixels/sec 76.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11.1 images/sec 6.71 images/sec
Photo processing 26.5 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.17 Mpixels/sec 3.21 Mpixels/sec
Samples 68 tests 18 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 3.5 images/sec 3.79 images/sec
Face detection 1.57 images/sec 1.88 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.02 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.75 Gpixels/sec 7.13 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 370.4 FPS 393.6 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 26 tests 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 225 233
Stability - 97%
Graphics test 2 FPS 2 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 686 -
Stability 99% -
Graphics test 4 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 10945 9630
Video editing score 6994 5765
Data manipulation score 9642 8000
Photo editing score 24463 28539
Writing score 14285 15985
Phones tested 11 models 5 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 59 FPS
[High]		 -
Call of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]		 -
Shadowgun Legends 49 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
World of Tanks Blitz 94 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Genshin Impact 53 FPS
[High]		 -
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 60 FPS
[Ultra]		 -
Device Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
1080 x 2400		 -
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 -> FlopsAnTuTu 12831230
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Bunny)Geekbench 7 GPU1188
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Bunny)Geekbench 7 CPU663 / 2476
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Bunny)Geekbench 7 CPU663 / 2476
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (tosaino)AnTuTu 12806833
Add View all (188)
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Ohm)AnTuTu 12805828
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Thun)AnTuTu 12874833
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (Jedrick)AnTuTu 11843534
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (MymySupremacy)AnTuTu 11839005
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Arda1)AnTuTu 11874742
Add View all (42)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Dimensity 7050

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
3x 2.4 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)		 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2400 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.4-A ARMv8.2-A
L2 cache 2 MB -
Process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 642 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 550 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 256 32
Total shaders 512 128
FLOPS 563.2 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 770 MediaTek APU 550

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem X53 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1600 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2021 May 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM7325 MT6877, MT6877V/TTZA
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site MediaTek Dimensity 7050 official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
3763 (57.5%)
2785 (42.5%)
Total votes: 6548

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (31)
2. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (1)
3. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (1)
4. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (10)
5. MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (7)
6. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (10)
7. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Helio G99 (10)
8. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (30)
9. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
10. Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Samsung Exynos 1380 (25)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7050 and Snapdragon 778G, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Maulana June 19, 2025 at 02:13 AM
778g is better and performance very god
0 Reply
Avatar
sfx May 18, 2025 at 08:55 AM
The 778G can play at 60 fps on very high settings in CODM. I got mine a few days ago, and I'm surprised. It can handle very high settings in most games, which makes it a better option compared to the 7050. The D7050 can play up to high settings on CODM from videos seen as of today.
0 Reply
Avatar
Jay April 28, 2025 at 05:47 AM
The 778g has 4 performance cores, whereas the 7050 has 2. Without a doubt, the Snapdragon processor is superior, as most demanding tasks are CPU bottlenecked, especially for a game like Genshin Impact.
+10 Reply
Avatar
It's me November 16, 2024 at 04:55 AM
With realme p1 5g this processor scores 600k + antutu score but only thing that disappointed me is it's stability I think realme should increase its stability by optimising it
+3 Reply
Avatar
Comparer August 21, 2024 at 01:24 AM
I think MediaTek Dimensity 7050 is better than SD778 because the clock speed and GPU frequency are faster. I compared both the processors; SD778 was slightly faster, but MD7050 has more smoothness!
+51 Reply
Avatar
TecUniverUNAM April 7, 2024 at 07:32 PM
The 778G is superior, as it is equipped with the 642L GPU. This gives it a significant graphical advantage, particularly for games, enabling it to deliver far more FPS. As a result, the Dimensity 7050 ends up delivering less performance.
+53 Reply
Avatar
Pobee May 24, 2023 at 12:56 PM
Mediatek rename the dimensity 1080 to 7050 this chip can't even reach a 450k score in antutu benchmark 😭
+858 Reply
Avatar
Bobee August 28, 2023 at 09:16 PM
in which phone was this not able to get above 450k antutu score? for the dimensity 1080? and lots of you guys agreed to this? what's the use of this website for :3 Goodness gracious.
+207 Reply
Avatar
Godfrey January 16, 2024 at 04:18 AM
You must have bought a fake 7050 phone, lmfao! 🀣🀣🀣
+63 Reply
Avatar
Ebram February 1, 2024 at 08:26 AM
The graphical performance of the Dimensity 7050 surpasses that of the Snapdragon 778G, making it more effective for gaming and optimization.
+123 Reply
Avatar
Ajs August 16, 2024 at 12:22 PM
Realme narzo 70 pro with this chipset scores more than 600k in antutu.
+9 Reply
Avatar
Peter November 17, 2024 at 03:20 AM
Godfrey, 7050 is garbage very lagging while playing game
+5 Reply
Avatar
Dan November 27, 2025 at 01:00 AM
Godfrey, 7050 Super fast, super smooth and MORE STABLE! Actual performance in real world. Not spec sheets.
0 Reply
EnglishРусский