Snapdragon 778G vs Helio G99
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (with Adreno 642 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G99 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
- Performs 4.4x better in floating-point computations
- Supports 51% higher memory bandwidth (25.6 against 17 GB/s)
- Shows significantly better (up to 41%) AnTuTu 11 score β 783K vs 554K
- 9% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2200 MHz)
- Better instruction set architecture
Pros of MediaTek Helio G99
- Higher GPU frequency (~82%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 326426 | 218545 |
| GPU | 101452 | 43804 |
| Memory | 119484 | 156545 |
| UX | 236244 | 135696 |
| Total score | 783606 | 554590 |
| Samples | [113 tests] | [313 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 157.1 MB/sec | 96.3 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 70.7 pages/sec | 52 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 113.9 Mpixels/sec | 72.2 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 55.4 images/sec | 38.5 images/sec |
| HDR | 91.1 Mpixels/sec | 63.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 11.1 images/sec | 5.68 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 26.5 images/sec | 16.6 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 4.17 Mpixels/sec | 2.79 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 68 tests | 82 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 3.5 images/sec | 2.02 images/sec |
| Face detection | 1.57 images/sec | 1 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.11 Gpixels/sec | 0.07 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.15 Gpixels/sec | 0.1 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.14 Gpixels/sec | 0.06 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.02 Gpixels/sec | 0.02 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 5.75 Gpixels/sec | 4.16 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 370.4 FPS | 251.6 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
| Samples | 26 tests | 48 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 225 | 135 |
| Stability | - | 98% |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 686 | 346 |
| Stability | 99% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10945 | 9196 |
| Video editing score | 6994 | 6615 |
| Data manipulation score | 9642 | 7349 |
| Photo editing score | 24463 | 25535 |
| Writing score | 14285 | 12807 |
| Phones tested | 11 models | 37 models |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | 59 FPS [High] |
86 FPS [Low] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 42 FPS [Ultra] |
37 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | 27 FPS [Low] |
- |
| Shadowgun Legends | 49 FPS [Ultra] |
91 FPS [Low] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 94 FPS [Ultra] |
66 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | 53 FPS [High] |
48 FPS [Ultra] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
55 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | Oppo Realme GT Master Edition 1080 x 2400 |
Cubot X70 1080 x 2408 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Recent User Tests
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-02 -> Flops | AnTuTu 12 | 831230 |
| π 2026-10-02 (Bunny) | Geekbench 7 GPU | 1188 |
| π 2026-10-02 (Bunny) | Geekbench 7 CPU | 663 / 2476 |
| π 2026-10-02 (Bunny) | Geekbench 7 CPU | 663 / 2476 |
| π 2026-09-30 (tosaino) | AnTuTu 12 | 806833 |
MediaTek Helio G99
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-10-03 (Joe) | AnTuTu 12 | 642231 |
| π 2026-10-03 (Josh Gay Is Back Again and Again) | AnTuTu 12 | 707841 |
| π 2026-10-03 (Josh Gay) | AnTuTu 12 | 698039 |
| π 2026-10-01 (Josh Gay Is Back Again) | AnTuTu 12 | 706364 |
| π 2026-09-30 (Lucas) | AnTuTu 12 | 607320 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 778G and Helio G99CPU
| Architecture | 1x 2.4 GHz β Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) 3x 2.4 GHz β Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) 4x 1.8 GHz β Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
2x 2.2 GHz β Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz β Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | - |
| Process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | 5 W | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 642 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 256 | 32 |
| Total shaders | 512 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 563.2 Gigaflops | 128 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 770 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 Gb/s | 17 Gb/s |
| Max size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X53 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 3700 Mbps | Up to 650 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 1600 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | May 2021 | May 2022 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM7325 | MT6789 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site | MediaTek Helio G99 official site |
| Successor | - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G | - |
Further details
Notes on Helio G99:
- The MediaTek G99 Ultimate is essentially the same chip as the G99, with a slightly higher clock speed and no noticeable performance difference. "Ultimate" naming was added for marketing purposes and could confuse the average consumer.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 3136
