Exynos 1680 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1680 (with Samsung Xclipse 550 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (Adreno 730). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 1680
  • Higher GPU frequency (~47%)
  • Shows slightly better (up to 7%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1390K vs 1294K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Performs 36% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1390055
CPU 510705 490530
GPU 374535 202615
Memory 204469 221583
UX 300346 380143
Total score 1390055 1294871
Samples [14 tests] [90 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 212.5 MB/sec 151.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 125.8 pages/sec 104.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 144.7 Mpixels/sec 124.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 86.1 images/sec 88.5 images/sec
HDR 141.1 Mpixels/sec 119.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 18 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Photo processing 39.6 images/sec 38.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.87 Mpixels/sec 4.49 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 54 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 13.3 images/sec 9.81 images/sec
Face detection 6.4 images/sec 4.42 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.33 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.46 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.42 Gpixels/sec 0.41 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 31.6 Gpixels/sec 15.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 958.9 FPS 1079.5 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 2 tests 30 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 729
Graphics test - 5 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 2255
Stability - 63%
Graphics test - 13 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 13237
Video editing score - 7311
Data manipulation score - 10976
Photo editing score - 27827
Writing score - 15631
Phones tested - 16 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 88 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 42 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 89 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 114 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 40 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1680
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-17 (Dashka)AnTuTu 121479450
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-16 (Faizer)AnTuTu 121547092
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-15 (Fernando)AnTuTu 121574995
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-11 (Taz)AnTuTu 111399404
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Galaxy A57)AnTuTu 121544715
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 (qwerty5313)Geekbench 6 GPU5731
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 (qwerty5313)Geekbench 6 CPU1640 / 4097
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-18 (qwerty5313)AnTuTu 121452589
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-17 (TSN_Hasan)CPU Throttle70%
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-17 (TSN_Hasan)Geekbench 7 GPU3623

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1680 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9-A
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 6 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5.3 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 550 Adreno 730
Architecture RDNA 3 Adreno 700
GPU frequency 1200 MHz 818 MHz
Pipelines 2 2
Shading units 128 512
Total shaders 256 1024
FLOPS 1228.8 Gigaflops 1675.3 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.1
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
NPU theoretical performance 19.6 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 5348 Snapdragon X65
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps Up to 3670 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 6.1 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2026 December 2021
Class Mid range Flagship
Model number S5E8865 SM8450
Official page Samsung Exynos 1680 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
114 (79.2%)
30 (20.8%)
Total votes: 144

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Exynos 1680, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Keviny9 October 19, 2026 at 05:23 PM
Exynos 1680 better price per performance
+1 Reply