Exynos 1680 vs Dimensity 8400

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1680 (with Samsung Xclipse 550 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (Mali-G720 MP7). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  • Supports 166% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 25.6 GB/s)
  • Performs 90% better in floating-point computations
  • Shows better (up to 40%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1948K vs 1390K
  • 12% higher CPU clock speed (3250 vs 2900 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1390055
1948428
CPU 510705 623766
GPU 374535 596540
Memory 204469 331200
UX 300346 396922
Total score 1390055 1948428
Samples [14 tests] [313 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1576
Multi-Core Score
6239
Asset compression 212.5 MB/sec 248.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 125.8 pages/sec 189.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 144.7 Mpixels/sec 189.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 86.1 images/sec 111.1 images/sec
HDR 141.1 Mpixels/sec 166.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 18 images/sec 19.8 images/sec
Photo processing 39.6 images/sec 58 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.87 Mpixels/sec 7.1 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 45 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
12162
Background blur 13.3 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Face detection 6.4 images/sec 11.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.33 Gpixels/sec 0.52 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.46 Gpixels/sec 0.71 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.42 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.11 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 31.6 Gpixels/sec 37.2 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 958.9 FPS 1703.3 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 2 tests 31 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score - 1346
Stability - 86%
Graphics test - 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 5948
Graphics test - 23 FPS
Section 1 - 25 FPS
Section 2 - 23 FPS
Section 3 - 20 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 14034
Video editing score - 6661
Data manipulation score - 13175
Photo editing score - 23584
Writing score - 17637
Phones tested - 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 1680
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 GPU6058
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 7 CPU1216 / 4433
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-25 (Anonim)AnTuTu 111375246
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> HaiLong0510AnTuTu 121533019
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-05 (Darck)AnTuTu 111348067
MediaTek Dimensity 8400
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-04 -> Timur55AnTuTu 111910022
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-02 (LEADER OF DAWN)Geekbench 7 CPU1165 / 3044
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-01 -> Mohammad.SodaeiAnTuTu 122257137
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Gelo)AnTuTu 122223623
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-28 (Abdul)AnTuTu 122149140

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 1680 and Dimensity 8400

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.9 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A720
4x 2.6 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A720
3x 1.95 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A520
1x 3.25 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
3x 3 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
4x 2.1 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A725
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2900 MHz 3250 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 6 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 7 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 550 Mali-G720 MP7
Architecture RDNA 3 5th gen
GPU frequency 1200 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 2 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 256 896
FLOPS 1228.8 Gigaflops 2329.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 880
NPU theoretical performance 19.6 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 12 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2960 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Shannon 5348 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 5100 Mbps Up to 5170 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1280 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 6.1 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced March 2026 December 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number S5E8865 MT6899, MT6899Z
Official page Samsung Exynos 1680 official site MediaTek Dimensity 8400 official site
Further details
Notes on Dimensity 8400:
    - โ€œDimensity 8400 Ultraโ€ is the same chip as โ€œDimensity 8400โ€ but marketed for better thermals and sustained performance.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
16 (14%)
98 (86%)
Total votes: 114

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 8400 and Exynos 1680, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Pro_G4mer_Plus March 26, 2026 at 05:16 PM
Dimensity wins It's not even close ๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ”ฅ
+3 Reply
Avatar
VIKTร˜H March 26, 2026 at 08:33 PM
Next time compare with a exynos 2400e upwards buddy, exynos 1680 is closer to 8300 not 8400
0 Reply
Avatar
Fixjd March 27, 2026 at 03:12 AM
Yes that's to be expected even they're the same midranger they're not on the same tier Dimensity 8000 series is upper midrange tier that so called flagship killer its 50-60% closer to flagship performance while Exynos 1680 is only a entry midrange which competes the likes of SD 7gen series or Dimensity 7000 series and Samsung never make upper midrange tier SoC or device if there's one to be considered maybe the FE
+3 Reply
Samuel28 April 16, 2026 at 04:25 AM
It would not win when it comes to thermals lol, mediatek got more heat
+1 Reply
Avatar
15T user May 19, 2026 at 03:44 AM
Samuel28, I have Xiaomi 15T with Dimensity 8400 ultra, it runs cool most of the time even when playing light games or during medium tasks. It only heats up when playing heavy games like NTE and WuWa. Guess what? Dimensity 8400 still produces less heat and slightly more efficient than Exynos 1680 lol.
+2 Reply