Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888 – what's better?

Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 888

Exynos 2200
VS
Snapdragon 888
Exynos 2200
Snapdragon 888

We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 2200 (with Samsung Xclipse 920 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (Adreno 660). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Gaming
  7. Specs
  8. Comments (4)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Higher GPU frequency (~55%)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 26%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1434K vs 1135K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
  • Performs 29% better in floating-point computations

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Exynos 2200
vs
Snapdragon 888

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Exynos 2200 +26%
1434169
Snapdragon 888
1135878
CPU 472427 406119
GPU 390230 233383
Memory 216173 188085
UX 355339 308291
Total score 1434169 1135878
Samples [52 tests] [127 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Exynos 2200 +6%
1588
Snapdragon 888
1500
Multi-Core Score
Exynos 2200 +12%
3958
Snapdragon 888
3537
Asset compression 169.2 MB/sec 156.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 103 pages/sec 86.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 133.7 Mpixels/sec 104.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 101.3 images/sec 72.9 images/sec
HDR 130.8 Mpixels/sec 104.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 14.7 images/sec 12.1 images/sec
Photo processing 34.9 images/sec 26.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.65 Mpixels/sec 4.04 Mpixels/sec
Samples 25 tests 49 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2200 +124%
10088
Snapdragon 888
4509
Background blur 14.6 images/sec 7.75 images/sec
Face detection 9.75 images/sec 3.37 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.36 Gpixels/sec 0.28 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.48 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 38.1 Gpixels/sec 13.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1860.5 FPS 851.2 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 14 tests 19 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 900 505
Stability 66% 77%
Graphics test 7 FPS 4 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 3972 -
Stability 66% -
Graphics test 15 FPS -
Section 1 18 FPS -
Section 2 15 FPS -
Section 3 12 FPS -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Exynos 2200 +27%
1918
Snapdragon 888
1508
Score 1918 1508
Stability 64% 91%
Graphics test 11 FPS 9 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Exynos 2200 +2%
13460
Snapdragon 888
13229
Web score 11932 12232
Video editing score 7385 7638
Data manipulation score 12323 10494
Photo editing score 24230 29866
Writing score 16664 15219
Phones tested 4 models 11 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 83 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 26 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 89 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 112 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 58 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Asus Zenfone 8
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGAnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 -> MOLANGGeekbench 6 GPU10630
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Ogurchik))AnTuTu 121628220
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Hangal)AnTuTu 111587642
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Basiks)AnTuTu 111227101
Add View all (87)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Zha)AnTuTu 12976692
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Aladdin)AnTuTu 121326171
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Aladdin)AnTuTu 121326171
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 -> NotezitGeekbench 6 CPU1412 / 3348
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-18 (Soul)AnTuTu 111210861
Add View all (171)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2200 and Snapdragon 888

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510		 1x 2.84 GHz – Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)
3x 2.42 GHz – Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)
4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2800 MHz 2840 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.4-A
L1 cache - 512 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 10.3 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 8 W
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 920 Adreno 660
Architecture RDNA 2 Adreno 600
GPU frequency 1306 MHz 840 MHz
Pipelines 3 3
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 384 768
FLOPS 1003 Gigaflops 1290.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.1
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 780

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS 8K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV		 - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300 X60
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 22
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7350 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced January 2022 December 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9925 SM8350
Official page Samsung Exynos 2200 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 official site
Successor - Samsung Exynos 2500 - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
2007 (59.5%)
1364 (40.5%)
Total votes: 3371

Related Comparisons

1. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (9)
2. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (43)
3. Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
4. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
5. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (34)
6. Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 888 and Exynos 2200, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
🀨🀨🀨 May 17, 2024 at 11:24 AM
The Exynos may still be more powerful, but the SD888 is way more optimized. I believe that's better for long-term usage, so I'm choosing Qualcomm here.
+42 Reply
Avatar
Kamal March 29, 2024 at 05:28 AM
Everything is excellent with Exynos, except for its stability. I believe that's crucial for long-term usage.
+36 Reply
Avatar
Petar September 11, 2023 at 03:39 PM
Even with these stats, I chose the Snapdragon 888. I'm not a fan of Exynos. (Exynos is okay, but I prefer SD.)
+110 Reply
Avatar
Krystyna Barry July 9, 2023 at 02:44 PM
It was a great aid in helping to make my decision to choose the Exynos 2200, thanks!
+143 Reply
EnglishРусский