Exynos 2500 vs Tensor G4

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2500 (Samsung Xclipse 950) with the older 8-core Google Tensor G4 (Mali-G715 MP7) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2500
  • Performs 2.4x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 51%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2289K vs 1519K
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • 6% higher CPU clock speed (3300 vs 3100 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
  • Supports 13% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 68.2 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2289696
1519937
CPU 771016 536742
GPU 723824 414930
Memory 356421 215572
UX 438435 352693
Total score 2289696 1519937
Samples [8 tests] [25 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2285
1707
Multi-Core Score
7874
4431
Asset compression 390.2 MB/sec 177.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 179.4 pages/sec 134 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 218.9 Mpixels/sec 157 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 247.5 images/sec 122 images/sec
HDR 309 Mpixels/sec 128.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 36.4 images/sec 15.8 images/sec
Photo processing 89.9 images/sec 39.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.7 Mpixels/sec 4.65 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 11 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2500 +116%
18873
8744
Background blur 35.4 images/sec 13.4 images/sec
Face detection 15.1 images/sec 8.51 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.45 Gpixels/sec 0.32 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.7 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.6 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 82.2 Gpixels/sec 26.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3446.8 FPS 1273.7 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 2 tests 9 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Exynos 2500 +113%
2231
1049
Score 2231 1049
Stability 54% 84%
Graphics test 17 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 9397 -
Graphics test 36 FPS -
Section 1 43 FPS -
Section 2 35 FPS -
Section 3 29 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
16035
13174
Web score 15720 10521
Video editing score 8133 7569
Data manipulation score 11954 14718
Photo editing score 32035 21074
Writing score 22532 15880
Phones tested Less than 3 4 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> INFCAnTuTu 112220403
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Koss)AnTuTu 112437711
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-19 (Yell)AnTuTu 112112394
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12Geekbench 6 GPU18873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12AnTuTu 112496663
Google Tensor G4
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 -> Oleg 16 cmAnTuTu 111423579
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (feraroof43)AnTuTu 111626655
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Leif)AnTuTu 111590049
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Kazin)AnTuTu 111723964
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-14 (123)Geekbench 6 GPU8744

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2500 and Tensor G4

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
2x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A725
5x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3300 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 3 MB -
L3 cache 16 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 950 Mali-G715 MP7
Architecture RDNA 3 Valhall 4th gen
GPU frequency 999 MHz 940 MHz
Pipelines 8 7
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1024 896
FLOPS 4091.9 Gigaflops 1684.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2400
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Exynos 5400c
4G support LTE Cat. 24 -
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps -
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 6.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced June 2025 August 2024
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9955 GS401 (S5P9875)
Official page Samsung Exynos 2500 official site -
Successor - - Google Tensor G5

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
142 (91.6%)
13 (8.4%)
Total votes: 155

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Tensor G4 and Exynos 2500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!