Exynos 2500 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

We compared the 10-core Samsung Exynos 2500 (Samsung Xclipse 950) with the older 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (Adreno 740) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2500
  • Has 8 MB larger L3 cache size than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
  • Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~47%)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 30%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2289K vs 1757K
  • Supports 14% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 67.2 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
2289696
CPU 771016 553922
GPU 723824 434880
Memory 356421 311861
UX 438435 456381
Total score 2289696 1757044
Samples [8 tests] [238 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 390.2 MB/sec 218.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 179.4 pages/sec 145.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 218.9 Mpixels/sec 168.3 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 247.5 images/sec 133 images/sec
HDR 309 Mpixels/sec 167.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 36.4 images/sec 18.8 images/sec
Photo processing 89.9 images/sec 34.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 12.7 Mpixels/sec 5.78 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 132 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Exynos 2500 +104%
18873
Background blur 35.4 images/sec 12.3 images/sec
Face detection 15.1 images/sec 5.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.45 Gpixels/sec 0.53 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.7 Gpixels/sec 0.56 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.6 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.23 Gpixels/sec 0.12 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 82.2 Gpixels/sec 32.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 3446.8 FPS 2177.4 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 2 tests 66 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 2231 1092
Stability 54% 67%
Graphics test 17 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Score 9397 5312
Stability - 67%
Graphics test 36 FPS 20 FPS
Section 1 43 FPS 23 FPS
Section 2 35 FPS 20 FPS
Section 3 29 FPS 17 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 3667
Stability - 45%
Graphics test - 21 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15720 13957
Video editing score 8133 7265
Data manipulation score 11954 14272
Photo editing score 32035 32179
Writing score 22532 17828
Phones tested Less than 3 9 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 90 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 60 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite - 56 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends - 118 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 120 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 59 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro
1116 x 2480
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Exynos 2500
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-16 -> INFCAnTuTu 112220403
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-01 (Koss)AnTuTu 112437711
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-19 (Yell)AnTuTu 112112394
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12Geekbench 6 GPU18873
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-26 -> everviolet12AnTuTu 112496663
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ciciz)AnTuTu 122032599
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Ciciz)AnTuTu 122032599
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Horizon377)AnTuTu 121894819
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (DiKevoLi'Phone)AnTuTu 121844320
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Mil)AnTuTu 121763249

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 2500 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X925
2x 2.74 GHz – Cortex-A725
5x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-X3
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A710
3x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3300 MHz 3200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache 128 KB -
L2 cache 3 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count - 16 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8.5 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Samsung Xclipse 950 Adreno 740
Architecture RDNA 3 Adreno 700
GPU frequency 999 MHz 680 MHz
Pipelines 8 3
Shading units 128 512
Total shaders 1024 1536
FLOPS 4091.9 Gigaflops 2089 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
NPU theoretical performance 59 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 4200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 67.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5400 Snapdragon X70
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 12100 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3670 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2025 November 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number S5E9955 SM8550-AB
Official page Samsung Exynos 2500 official site Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Further details
Notes on Snapdragon 8 Gen 2:
    - There's also the "Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy," which only differs by having a 160 MHz higher CPU clock and a 39 MHz higher GPU clock, resulting in 2208.8 GFLOPS for the GPU. Generally, you won't notice this difference in real-life usage, including games.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
66 (68%)
31 (32%)
Total votes: 97

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Exynos 2500, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
JuicyPhoneLeaks May 16, 2024 at 06:48 AM
Radeon 6650XT On The Go, Trust Me Bro.
0 Reply
Avatar
Jeremy Hanson July 18, 2025 at 03:02 AM
Zflip 7 on Pre Order. Going to be a Wild Gaming Device.
+1 Reply
Avatar
adhd guy October 15, 2025 at 03:32 AM
A exynos 2500 isn't anywhere NEAR a 6650 XT. It's a GTX 1050 equivalent
0 Reply