Exynos 9825 vs Snapdragon 778G
We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 9825 (with Mali-G76 MP12 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (Adreno 642). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 9825
- Higher GPU frequency (~37%)
- Supports 30% higher memory bandwidth (33.4 against 25.6 GB/s)
- 14% higher CPU clock speed (2730 vs 2400 MHz)
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
- Performs 30% better in floating-point computations
- Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
- Better instruction set architecture
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 296289 | 326426 |
| GPU | 141109 | 101452 |
| Memory | 170792 | 119484 |
| UX | 190732 | 236244 |
| Total score | 798922 | 783606 |
| Samples | [12 tests] | [113 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 112.1 MB/sec | 157.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 72.6 pages/sec | 70.7 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 77 Mpixels/sec | 113.9 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 46.9 images/sec | 55.4 images/sec |
| HDR | 84.4 Mpixels/sec | 91.1 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 7.61 images/sec | 11.1 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 26.1 images/sec | 26.5 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.96 Mpixels/sec | 4.17 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 6 tests | 68 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 7.65 images/sec | 3.5 images/sec |
| Face detection | 4.79 images/sec | 1.57 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.26 Gpixels/sec | 0.11 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 0.43 Gpixels/sec | 0.15 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 0.25 Gpixels/sec | 0.14 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.07 Gpixels/sec | 0.02 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 15.5 Gpixels/sec | 5.75 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 533.9 FPS | 370.4 FPS |
| API | Vulkan | OpenCL |
| Samples | 4 tests | 26 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 393 | 225 |
| Stability | 96% | - |
| Graphics test | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 1003 | 686 |
| Stability | 95% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 8308 | 10945 |
| Video editing score | 5802 | 6994 |
| Data manipulation score | 7232 | 9642 |
| Photo editing score | 19062 | 24463 |
| Writing score | 10895 | 14285 |
| Phones tested | 2 models | 11 models |
Gaming
| PUBG Mobile | - | 59 FPS [High] |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | - | 42 FPS [Ultra] |
| Fortnite | - | 27 FPS [Low] |
| Shadowgun Legends | - | 49 FPS [Ultra] |
| World of Tanks Blitz | - | 94 FPS [Ultra] |
| Genshin Impact | - | 53 FPS [High] |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | - | 60 FPS [Ultra] |
| Device | - | Oppo Realme GT Master Edition 1080 x 2400 |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Recent User Tests
Samsung Exynos 9825
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-28 (Tomio.tomato) | AnTuTu 11 | 820039 |
| π 2026-06-17 -> j7primeciadam | AnTuTu 11 | 819454 |
| π 2026-05-25 (M1nn44a) | AnTuTu 11 | 722666 |
| π 2026-03-22 (Wolf_Tech πΊ) | AnTuTu 11 | 824382 |
| π 2026-03-14 (Random person) | AnTuTu 11 | 806002 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-30 (tosaino) | AnTuTu 12 | 806833 |
| π 2026-09-28 -> VoidxEo | AnTuTu 12 | 887900 |
| π 2026-09-27 (Andy Swas) | AnTuTu 11 | 725254 |
| π 2026-09-25 (Eversonsouzz) | AnTuTu 12 | 851236 |
| π 2026-09-22 (bebequinhamota) | AnTuTu 12 | 805881 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9825 and Snapdragon 778GCPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.73 GHz β M4 2x 2.4 GHz β Cortex-A75 4x 1.95 GHz β Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.4 GHz β Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) 3x 2.4 GHz β Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) 4x 1.8 GHz β Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2730 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Process | 7 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 8.5 billion | - |
| TDP (Sustained Power Limit) | - | 5 W |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 642 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 3rd gen | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 754 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Pipelines | 12 | 2 |
| Shading units | 24 | 256 |
| Total shaders | 288 | 512 |
| FLOPS | 434.3 Gigaflops | 563.2 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | - | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 770 |
| NPU theoretical performance | 1.86 TOPS | - |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 33.4 Gb/s | 25.6 Gb/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 | UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 |
| Max display resolution | 3840 x 2400 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 36MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Exynos 5100 | X53 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 20 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2000 Mbps | Up to 3700 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 316 Mbps | Up to 1600 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | August 2019 | May 2021 |
| Class | Flagship | Mid range |
| Model number | S5E9825 | SM7325 |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 9825 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G official site |
| Successor | - Samsung Exynos 2500 | - Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2975
