Xring O3 vs Xring O1

We compared two 10-core processors: Xiaomi Xring O3 (with Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 graphics) and Xring O1 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O3
  • Shows significantly better (up to 76%) AnTuTu 11 score – 5228K vs 2963K
  • Supports 48% higher memory bandwidth (113.8 against 76.8 GB/s)
  • 12% higher CPU clock speed (4350 vs 3900 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~15%)
  • Performs 15% better in floating-point computations
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
vs

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Xring O3 +76%
5228014
2963052
CPU 1359147 937172
GPU 2143582 996086
Memory 941063 409648
UX 784222 620146
Total score 5228014 2963052
Samples Less than 3 [5 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Xring O3 +35%
3715
2746
Multi-Core Score
Xring O3 +69%
14213
8431
Asset compression - 332.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser - 236.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer - 266 Mpixels/sec
Image detection - 208.8 images/sec
HDR - 262.9 Mpixels/sec
Background blur - 32.7 images/sec
Photo processing - 80.1 images/sec
Ray tracing - 8.25 Mpixels/sec
Samples - 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Xring O3 +72%
36901
21512
Background blur - 42.3 images/sec
Face detection - 14.3 images/sec
Horizon detection - 0.9 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection - 1.15 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur - 1.72 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching - 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching - 71.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics - 2977 FPS
API - Vulkan
Samples - 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xring O3 +95%
4700
2413
Score 4700 2413
Stability - 92%
Graphics test - 18 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
n/a
9022
Score - 9022
Graphics test - 34 FPS
Section 1 - 37 FPS
Section 2 - 35 FPS
Section 3 - 31 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xring O3 +97%
11474
5832
Score 11474 5832
Graphics test - 34 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
n/a
15735
Web score - 17566
Video editing score - 6957
Data manipulation score - 15048
Photo editing score - 27481
Writing score - 19142
Phones tested - 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Xring O3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> manvanconggggAnTuTu 124862080
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-08 (KarlderaL)AnTuTu 125558210
Xiaomi Xring O1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo)AnTuTu 112842416
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Albert)CPU Throttle92%
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 GPU21512
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 CPU2746 / 8431
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)AnTuTu 112963052

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Xring O3 and Xring O1

CPU

Architecture 2x 4.35 GHz – C1-Ultra
4x 3.68 GHz – C1-Premium
4x 3.15 GHz – C1-Pro
2x 3.9 GHz – Cortex-X925
4x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 10 10
Frequency 4350 MHz 3900 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.3-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache 12 MB -
L3 cache 16 MB -
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 24 billion 19 billion
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16
Architecture Valhall 6th gen Valhall 5th gen
GPU frequency 1600 MHz 1392 MHz
Pipelines 16 16
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 2048 2048
FLOPS 6554 Gigaflops 5701.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.4 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.2 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
NPU theoretical performance 200 TOPS 44 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR6 LPDDR5T
Memory frequency 5333 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 24 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 113.8 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem - MediaTek T800
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed - Up to 7900 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 4200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced August 2026 May 2025
Class Flagship Flagship

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
86 (97.7%)
2 (2.3%)
Total votes: 88

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Xring O1 and Xring O3, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
pavlecom September 8, 2026 at 02:35 AM
Jaw dropping! This is a Far Ahead Quantum Jump on performance! πŸ”₯⚑
+3 Reply
Avatar
iamhourny September 22, 2026 at 03:46 AM
here's your jaw, it drops
+1 Reply
Deliond September 1, 2026 at 12:03 PM
Top massive buffs of the decade.
+7 Reply
Avatar
iamhourny September 22, 2026 at 03:46 AM
and it's fake uhuhuh
0 Reply