Xiaomi Xring O1 β an 10-core chipset that was announced on May 22, 2025, and is manufactured using a 3-nanometer process technology. It has 2 cores Cortex-X925 at 3900 MHz, 4 cores Cortex-A725 at 3400 MHz, 2 cores Cortex-A725 at 1900 MHz, and 2 cores Cortex-A520 at 1800 MHz.
Review
CPU Performance
91
Gaming Performance
74
Battery life
92
NanoReview Score
86
Compare Xiaomi Xring O1 with other SoCs
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
AnTuTu 11
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Huawei is uncle of All CompaniesOctober 20, 2025 at 12:35 PM
Huawei is the best, but it's opressed.
+15Reply
AhmadAugust 30, 2026 at 07:59 AM
Dont ban used tsmc dont smic, different samsung used semiconductor samsung foundry
0Reply
ManongJune 29, 2025 at 01:06 PM
First ever processor with 16 pipelines. gigaflops also are massive numbers!
this 10 core will heat up like crazy. i bet they can make it 12 cores next time .
+39Reply
RobJune 27, 2025 at 04:26 PM
I've noticed their CPU part is really good, but GPU is kinda asscheeks due to the lack of SLC cache. Hope they'll change it with xring o2
+25Reply
AnonimJune 12, 2025 at 04:49 PM
Huawei should buy these chips
+70Reply
TriplerYTOctober 3, 2025 at 06:14 AM
Huawei can't buy/use this bcz of this chip manufactured by tsmc!
Serhii, It's a marketing term they used; SK Hynix being the first to make 9600 MT/s LPDDR5X RAM, not Samsung. It's not an official term. Even JEDEC just calls it LPDDR5X-9600.
to quote:
>On 25 January 2023 SK Hynix announced "Low Power Double Data Rate 5 Turbo" (LPDDR5T) chips with a bandwidth of 9.6 Gbit/s. It operates in the ultra-low voltage range of 1.01β1.12 V set by JEDEC. It has been incorporated into the LPDDR5X standard as LPDDR5X-9600 making "LPDDR5T" a brand name.
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 supports LPDDR5T.
source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LPDDR#LPDDR5X
Serhii, It doesn't exist.
When SK Hynix came up with 9600 MT/s modules they couldn't call it LPDDR5X because at the time official LPDDR5X was up to 8533 MT/s only.
So they came up with LPDDR5T as a temporary name until JEDEC expanded official LPDDR5X speeds up to 10666 MT/s so that the "LPDDR5T" can be officially called LPDDR5X.
Joe, MediaTek, for example, uses this memory name officially; it is specified in the official specifications of the flagship Dimensity 9300 processor. Therefore, I cannot say that this is LPDDR5x memory, because MediaTek officially specifies LPDDR5T on its website. The situation is similar with Xiaomi.
Serhii, Manufacturers usually don't update their websites post launch, I already gave you an example of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X supporting 192GB RAM via BIOS update (Support came via AGESA update by AMD themselves) yet the product page still shows 128GB.
+5Reply
ZhinazhuJune 4, 2025 at 02:48 AM
Google and Samsung should fire their chip design teams and switch to MediaTek processors. Apparently there is a group of high-paying parasites present in their company
+41Reply
AhmadNovember 3, 2025 at 10:26 AM
What you are talking?
+4Reply
AhmadAugust 30, 2026 at 07:57 AM
Exynos 2600 higher antutu v11
0Reply
AlifJune 2, 2025 at 12:41 PM
Dear Admin, why this chip is not in ranking. Please add it in ranking
Why is it a waste of time? I personally haven't used a smartphone or tablet with this chip. But more competition is always better. It pushes each other to actually try delievering better products in best case scenario. And this one's a really high end one, seems to be an actual competitor to Dimensity 9400s and Snapdragon 8 Elite, imagine what that means in the flagship section. >.>
+49Reply
HashV8June 8, 2025 at 07:45 AM
The same was said for Dimensity some months ago. So give it some time. They're already 5th in the rankings. Only just below the A18 Pro.
O1 shouldnβt have major optimization issues with games since most popular Android titles are Chinese dev-made. They should get some exclusive treatment. Now, Xiaomi should jump to the laptop market with their own laptop and SoC.
Well well well what do we have here? I wonder what excuse the Dimensity 9400 plus and upcoming Exynos 2500 will have for failing to beat this...
+23Reply
GodJune 3, 2025 at 08:44 PM
u mean Exynos 2500? cuz Dimensity 9400+ already beat this chip π
+11Reply
BallsJune 6, 2025 at 07:03 AM
The dimensity 9400 plus hits 2.9 million like it's nothing. Also you should know xiaomi is well known for their horrible thermal management in their flagship phones. Their xiaomi 15 overheats like crazy compared to other snapdragon 8 elite flagships. So yeah, you can praise the chip but just know the real life performance will be cucked by xiaomi's shitty cooling system
There is a mistake, the GPU is 16 core ARM Immortalis-G925 not 12 core Immortalis-G925 like MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
you need to change it and post the right one, it's ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16, not ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
+3Reply
LynxVexMay 25, 2025 at 10:10 AM
There is a mistake, the GPU is 16 core Immortalis-G925 not 12 core Immortalis-G925 like MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
