Xring O1 vs A17 Pro

We compared the 10-core Xiaomi Xring O1 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16) with the older 6-core Apple A17 Pro (Apple A17 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O1
  • Performs 2.7x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 2x) AnTuTu 11 score – 2963K vs 1467K
  • Has 4 more cores
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
vs

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Xring O1 +102%
2963052
1467470
CPU 937172 374357
GPU 996086 463612
Memory 409648 184670
UX 620146 444831
Total score 2963052 1467470
Samples [5 tests] [21 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
2746
A17 Pro +8%
2969
Multi-Core Score
Xring O1 +11%
8431
7599
Asset compression 332.8 MB/sec 254.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 236.9 pages/sec 166 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 266 Mpixels/sec 180.7 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 208.8 images/sec 178.7 images/sec
HDR 262.9 Mpixels/sec 240.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 32.7 images/sec 26.7 images/sec
Photo processing 80.1 images/sec 77.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 8.25 Mpixels/sec 7.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples 4 tests 32 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
21512
A17 Pro +30%
28057
Background blur 42.3 images/sec 55.5 images/sec
Face detection 14.3 images/sec 65.1 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.9 Gpixels/sec 0.8 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.15 Gpixels/sec 1.08 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.72 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.43 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 71.6 Gpixels/sec 87.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2977 FPS 3313.9 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 4 tests 22 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xring O1 +73%
2413
1391
Score 2413 1391
Stability 92% 71%
Graphics test 18 FPS 10 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Xring O1 +48%
9022
6089
Score 9022 6089
Stability - 73%
Graphics test 34 FPS 23 FPS
Section 1 37 FPS 29 FPS
Section 2 35 FPS 23 FPS
Section 3 31 FPS 16 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xring O1 +60%
5832
3655
Score 5832 3655
Stability - 63%
Graphics test 34 FPS 21 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
15735
n/a
Web score 17566 -
Video editing score 6957 -
Data manipulation score 15048 -
Photo editing score 27481 -
Writing score 19142 -
Phones tested 3 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Xring O1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo)AnTuTu 112842416
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Albert)CPU Throttle92%
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 GPU21512
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 CPU2746 / 8431
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)AnTuTu 112963052
Apple A17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (podsolnuh)AnTuTu 111357765
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Zabza)AnTuTu 111599694
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (elio)AnTuTu 111445771
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (human)Geekbench 6 GPU26734
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-28 (human)Geekbench 6 CPU2892 / 7293

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Xring O1 and A17 Pro

CPU

Architecture 2x 3.9 GHz – Cortex-X925
4x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
2x 3.78 GHz – Everest
4x 2.11 GHz – Sawtooth
Cores 10 6
Frequency 3900 MHz 3780 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 16 MB
Process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Transistor count 19 billion 19 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 Apple A17 GPU
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1392 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 16 6
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 2048 768
FLOPS 5701.6 Gigaflops 2147.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 44 TOPS 35 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5T LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 8 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 NVMe
Max display resolution - 1290 x 2796
Max camera resolution - 1x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 Snapdragon X70
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7900 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2025 September 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - APL1V02
Successor - - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
47 (87%)
7 (13%)
Total votes: 54

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A17 Pro and Xring O1, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!