Xring O1 vs Dimensity 9400
We compared the 10-core Xiaomi Xring O1 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16) with the older 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9400 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O1
- Has 2 more cores
- Performs 15% better in floating-point computations
- 8% higher CPU clock speed (3900 vs 3620 MHz)
- Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 11 score β 2963K vs 2825K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400
- Higher GPU frequency (~16%)
- Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (85.3 against 76.8 GB/s)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 11
| CPU | 937172 | 900074 |
| GPU | 996086 | 972096 |
| Memory | 409648 | 345330 |
| UX | 620146 | 607687 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 2825187 |
| Samples | [5 tests] | [72 tests] |
GeekBench 6
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Asset compression | 332.8 MB/sec | 344.4 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 236.9 pages/sec | 251 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 266 Mpixels/sec | 258.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 208.8 images/sec | 209.7 images/sec |
| HDR | 262.9 Mpixels/sec | 267.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 32.7 images/sec | 30.9 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 80.1 images/sec | 84.4 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 8.25 Mpixels/sec | 9.3 Mpixels/sec |
| Samples | 4 tests | 22 tests |
Compute Score (GPU)
| Background blur | 42.3 images/sec | 43 images/sec |
| Face detection | 14.3 images/sec | 19.8 images/sec |
| Horizon detection | 0.9 Gpixels/sec | 0.78 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge detection | 1.15 Gpixels/sec | 0.63 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian blur | 1.72 Gpixels/sec | 1.71 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature matching | 0.22 Gpixels/sec | 0.29 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo matching | 71.6 Gpixels/sec | 73.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle physics | 2977 FPS | 3456.3 FPS |
| API | Vulkan | OpenCL |
| Samples | 4 tests | 17 tests |
3DMark
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Score | 2413 | 2371 |
| Stability | 92% | 61% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Score | 9022 | 10747 |
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | 41 FPS |
| Section 1 | 37 FPS | 46 FPS |
| Section 2 | 35 FPS | 42 FPS |
| Section 3 | 31 FPS | 36 FPS |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Score | 5832 | 6272 |
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | 37 FPS |
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17566 | 14420 |
| Video editing score | 6957 | 6211 |
| Data manipulation score | 15048 | 16192 |
| Photo editing score | 27481 | 30985 |
| Writing score | 19142 | 19569 |
| Phones tested | 3 models | 6 models |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Xring O1
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo) | AnTuTu 11 | 2842416 |
| π 2026-04-09 (Albert) | CPU Throttle | 92% |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 21512 |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2746 / 8431 |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | AnTuTu 11 | 2963052 |
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-30 -> Bronelliant | AnTuTu 12 | 2833803 |
| π 2026-09-25 (AZA_KEN) | AnTuTu 11 | 2765026 |
| π 2026-09-12 (Oussama barhmate) | AnTuTu 12 | 3135000 |
| π 2026-08-09 (chakzz_0) | AnTuTu 11 | 2935203 |
| π 2026-08-01 -> Dlack | AnTuTu 11 | 2847396 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Xring O1 and Dimensity 9400CPU
| Architecture | 2x 3.9 GHz β Cortex-X925 4x 3.4 GHz β Cortex-A725 2x 1.9 GHz β Cortex-A725 2x 1.8 GHz β Cortex-A520 |
1x 3.62 GHz β Cortex-X925 3x 3.3 GHz β Cortex-X4 4x 2.4 GHz β Cortex-A720 |
| Cores | 10 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3900 MHz | 3620 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 12 MB |
| Process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 19 billion | - |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| Architecture | Valhall 5th gen | Valhall 5th gen |
| GPU frequency | 1392 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| Pipelines | 16 | 12 |
| Shading units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shaders | 2048 | 1536 |
| FLOPS | 5701.6 Gigaflops | 4952.1 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | 12.1 |
AI Accelerator
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| NPU theoretical performance | 44 TOPS | 50 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR5T | LPDDR5X |
| Memory frequency | 4800 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 4x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 76.8 Gb/s | 85.3 Gb/s |
| Max size | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Storage type | UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Max display resolution | - | 3840 x 2160 |
| Max camera resolution | - | 1x 320MP |
| Video capture | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video playback | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek T800 | - |
| 4G support | - | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 7900 Mbps | Up to 7300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 4200 Mbps | - |
| Wi-Fi | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | May 2025 | October 2024 |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Model number | - | MT6991, MT6991Z/CZA, MT6991W/CZA |
| Official page | - | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 official site |
| Successor | - | - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 330
