Xring O1 vs Dimensity 9300

We compared the 10-core Xiaomi Xring O1 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16) with the older 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9300 (Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O1
  • Performs 43% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • 20% higher CPU clock speed (3900 vs 3250 MHz)
  • Shows better (up to 21%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2963K vs 2447K
  • Higher GPU frequency (~7%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Xring O1 +21%
2963052
2447714
CPU 937172 740213
GPU 996086 789881
Memory 409648 362038
UX 620146 555582
Total score 2963052 2447714
Samples [5 tests] [16 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Xring O1 +26%
2746
Multi-Core Score
Xring O1 +14%
8431
Asset compression 332.8 MB/sec 299.9 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 236.9 pages/sec 218.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 266 Mpixels/sec 258.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 208.8 images/sec 162.1 images/sec
HDR 262.9 Mpixels/sec 219.5 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 32.7 images/sec 27.4 images/sec
Photo processing 80.1 images/sec 60.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 8.25 Mpixels/sec 8.03 Mpixels/sec
Samples 4 tests 9 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Xring O1 +43%
21512
Background blur 42.3 images/sec 25.6 images/sec
Face detection 14.3 images/sec 12.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.9 Gpixels/sec 0.67 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.15 Gpixels/sec 0.81 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.72 Gpixels/sec 0.86 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.23 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 71.6 Gpixels/sec 29.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2977 FPS 3109.3 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 5 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xring O1 +33%
2413
Score 2413 1814
Stability 92% 68%
Graphics test 18 FPS 13 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Xring O1 +18%
9022
Score 9022 7667
Stability - 64%
Graphics test 34 FPS 29 FPS
Section 1 37 FPS 32 FPS
Section 2 35 FPS 30 FPS
Section 3 31 FPS 25 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xring O1 +24%
5832
Score 5832 4692
Stability - 59%
Graphics test 34 FPS 28 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Xring O1 +12%
15735
Web score 17566 11741
Video editing score 6957 5651
Data manipulation score 15048 12096
Photo editing score 27481 28882
Writing score 19142 22861
Phones tested 3 models 3 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Xring O1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo)AnTuTu 112842416
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Albert)CPU Throttle92%
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 GPU21512
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 CPU2746 / 8431
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)AnTuTu 112963052
MediaTek Dimensity 9300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (TΓΊ LΓͺ)AnTuTu 122435544
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-22 (memevjppro🐭)AnTuTu 122609259
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-09 (Mnich)AnTuTu 122711576
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (Bhumit)AnTuTu 112262755
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 (Mnich.cz)AnTuTu 112575927

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Xring O1 and Dimensity 9300

CPU

Architecture 2x 3.9 GHz – Cortex-X925
4x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3900 MHz 3250 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L1 cache - 128 KB
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 8 MB
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 19 billion 22.7 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 7 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
Architecture Valhall 5th gen 5th gen
GPU frequency 1392 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 16 12
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 2048 1536
FLOPS 5701.6 Gigaflops 3993.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12.1 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 790
NPU theoretical performance 44 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5T LPDDR5T
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution - 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution - 1x 320MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 MediaTek T830
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7900 Mbps Up to 7900 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 4200 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2025 November 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - MT6989
Official page - MediaTek Dimensity 9300 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 9500

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
14 (66.7%)
7 (33.3%)
Total votes: 21

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 9300 and Xring O1, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!