Xring O1 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 3

We compared the 10-core Xiaomi Xring O1 (Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16) with the older 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (Adreno 750) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Xiaomi Xring O1
  • Performs 2.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Higher GPU frequency (~39%)
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Has a smaller size transistor (3 versus 4 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 26%) AnTuTu 11 score – 2963K vs 2345K
  • 18% higher CPU clock speed (3900 vs 3300 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Xring O1 +26%
2963052
CPU 937172 700525
GPU 996086 805478
Memory 409648 296043
UX 620146 543517
Total score 2963052 2345563
Samples [5 tests] [443 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Xring O1 +25%
2746
Multi-Core Score
Xring O1 +29%
8431
Asset compression 332.8 MB/sec 256.8 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 236.9 pages/sec 190.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 266 Mpixels/sec 209.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 208.8 images/sec 168.6 images/sec
HDR 262.9 Mpixels/sec 208.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 32.7 images/sec 24 images/sec
Photo processing 80.1 images/sec 63.6 images/sec
Ray tracing 8.25 Mpixels/sec 7.27 Mpixels/sec
Samples 4 tests 139 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Xring O1 +40%
21512
Background blur 42.3 images/sec 26.9 images/sec
Face detection 14.3 images/sec 13.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.9 Gpixels/sec 0.7 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.15 Gpixels/sec 0.61 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.72 Gpixels/sec 0.98 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 71.6 Gpixels/sec 43.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2977 FPS 3083.6 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 4 tests 90 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Xring O1 +46%
2413
Score 2413 1652
Stability 92% 79%
Graphics test 18 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Solar Bay
Xring O1 +10%
9022
Score 9022 8190
Stability - 72%
Graphics test 34 FPS 31 FPS
Section 1 37 FPS 36 FPS
Section 2 35 FPS 31 FPS
Section 3 31 FPS 26 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Xring O1 +25%
5832
Score 5832 4676
Graphics test 34 FPS 27 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
15735
16318
Web score 17566 16536
Video editing score 6957 7905
Data manipulation score 15048 14260
Photo editing score 27481 31248
Writing score 19142 19168
Phones tested 3 models 41 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Xring O1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo)AnTuTu 112842416
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Albert)CPU Throttle92%
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 GPU21512
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 CPU2746 / 8431
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)AnTuTu 112963052
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 (gertjan28)AnTuTu 112286235
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (neko_rhythm)AnTuTu 112406819
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Denislav Antimov)AnTuTu 122573019
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (DEMON77)AnTuTu 122536327
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 (Dairy_Milk)AnTuTu 122593648

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Xring O1 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 3

CPU

Architecture 2x 3.9 GHz – Cortex-X925
4x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A725
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520
1x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 3.15 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A720
2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A520
Cores 10 8
Frequency 3900 MHz 3300 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9.2-A ARMv9.2-A
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 12 MB
Process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 19 billion -
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) - 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 Adreno 750
Architecture Valhall 5th gen Adreno 700
GPU frequency 1392 MHz 903-1000 MHz
Pipelines 16 6
Shading units 128 256
Total shaders 2048 1536
FLOPS 5701.6 Gigaflops 2774 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 12.1

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
NPU theoretical performance 44 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5T LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 76.8 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 24 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1
Max display resolution - 3840 x 2160
Max camera resolution - 1x 200MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 Snapdragon X75
4G support - LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7900 Mbps Up to 10000 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 5.4 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced May 2025 October 2023
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number - SM8650-AB, SM8650-AC
Official page - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 official site
Successor - - Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Further details
Notes on Snapdragon 8 Gen 3:
    - Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy has a 100 MHz higher CPU and GPU clock speed. It has a higher GPU performance rate of up to 3072 Gigaflops.

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
151 (77.8%)
43 (22.2%)
Total votes: 194

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Xring O1, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!