Oppo Pad 5 vs Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
Here we compared two tablets: the 12.1-inch Oppo Pad 5 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on October 16, 2025, against the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad 5
- 84% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2873K versus 1564K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 45W)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- 11% higher pixel density (304 vs 273 PPI)
- 2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2762 and 1407 points
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- Fingerprint scanner
- Reverse charging feature
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 12.7 inches |
| Resolution | 2120 x 3000 pixels | 2944 x 1840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 304 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 900 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | - | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5% | 84.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 93.7% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 28 ms |
| Contrast | - | 918:1 |
Screen space comparison
Moto Pad 60 Pro
12.7″ (16:10 ratio) = 72.5 in2
Pad 5
12.1″ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
~4% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 266.9 mm (10.51 inches) | 291.8 mm (11.49 inches) |
| Width | 193.4 mm (7.61 inches) | 189.1 mm (7.44 inches) |
| Thickness | 6 mm (0.24 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 577 g (20.35 oz) | 620 g (21.87 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray, Purple | Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 516 cm2 (80 inches2) | 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | Good (3.49/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Bad (E) · 10 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (26th and 61st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (19th and 45th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
| Max clock | 3630 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 21671 | - |
| Single-core score | 2762 | 1407 |
| Multi-core score | 8560 | 4370 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 838002 | 458662 |
| GPU | 1024333 | 368791 |
| Memory | 398068 | 303801 |
| UX | 612893 | 433346 |
| Total score | 2873296 | 1564600 |
| Samples | [114 tests] | Less than 3 |
Recent User Tests
Oppo Pad 5
No benchmark results yet
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-21 -> abangzamani92 | AnTuTu 11 | 1564600 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 14 |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | - |
| OS size | - | 28 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 10420 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | October 2025 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $315 |
| Successor | - Oppo Pad 3 Pro | - |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Yes, 68 W |
Further details
Notes on Moto Pad 60 Pro:
- The 128 GB version comes with slower UFS 3.1 storage.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Pad 5 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1