Xiaomi Pad 6 vs Oppo Pad 5
Here we compared two tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Pad 6 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 870) that was released on April 18, 2023, against the Oppo Pad 5, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus and came out 2 years and 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 6
- Much smaller footprint: 19% more compact case (64.9 vs 80 square inches)
- Weighs 87 grams less
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad 5
- 2.9x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2873K versus 1005K)
- Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 1580 mAh larger battery capacity: 10420 vs 8840 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 33W)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
- More energy-efficient CPU โ Dimensity 9400 Plus
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1800 x 2880 pixels | 2120 x 3000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 309 ppi | 304 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 550 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6% | 86.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 97% | - |
| PWM | 181600 Hz | - |
| Response time | 26 ms | - |
| Contrast | 832:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 5
12.1โณ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
Pad 6
11โณ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~27% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 253.95 mm (10 inches) | 266.9 mm (10.51 inches) |
| Width | 165.18 mm (6.5 inches) | 193.4 mm (7.61 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.51 mm (0.26 inches) | 6 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 490 g (17.28 oz) | 577 g (20.35 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gold, Blue | Silver, Gray, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 419 cm2 (65 inches2) | 516 cm2 (80 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.49/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Bad (E) ยท 10 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (95th and 26th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (71st and 19th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max clock | 3200 MHz | 3630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) |
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 7 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 698 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Adreno 650 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 670 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1029.1 GFLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 3371 | 21671 |
| Single-core score | 1315 | 2762 |
| Multi-core score | 3506 | 8560 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 376827 | 838002 |
| GPU | 151343 | 1024333 |
| Memory | 182214 | 398068 |
| UX | 295214 | 612893 |
| Total score | 1005598 | 2873296 |
| Samples | [15 tests] | [114 tests] |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | 6 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1147 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 6
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| ๐ 2026-10-12 (Peanut) | AnTuTu 12 | 1132636 |
| ๐ 2026-09-21 -> sbx.777 | AnTuTu 12 | 1143560 |
| ๐ 2026-08-04 (ะััะตะฝ) | AnTuTu 11 | 933942 |
| ๐ 2026-07-21 (Peso Penguin) | AnTuTu 11 | 993797 |
| ๐ 2026-06-27 (Aaru) | AnTuTu 11 | 932844 |
Oppo Pad 5
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 3200 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 1.0 | ColorOS 16 |
| OS size | 21 GB | - |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 8840 mAh | 10420 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (38% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:30 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | - | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | 11:51 hr | - |
| Watching video | 15:38 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:18 hr | - |
| Standby | 139 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | 120 FPS (720p) | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (โ 0.25 inch) | 1/4.0" (โ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | - | No |
| 5G support | - | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2023 | October 2025 |
| Release date | April 2023 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | $499 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi Pad 8 | - Oppo Pad 3 Pro |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 33 W | Yes, 67 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Pad 5 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2