Intel Core i7 10700K vs i5 13600K

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.8 GHz Intel Core i7 10700K with 8-cores against the 3.5 GHz i5 13600K with 14-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
16.3
(Bad)
Value Index
29.7
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 13600K and 10700K
Advantages of Intel Core i5 13600K
  • Around 43.8 GB/s (96%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • Has 6 more physical cores
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • Newer - released 2 years and 5 months later
  • More powerful Intel UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics: 0.8 vs 0.5 TFLOPS
  • 59% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 2718 vs 1711 points
  • Has 8 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Supports up to 192 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
  • More modern manufacturing process – 10 versus 14 nanometers

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 492
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 5581
Cinebench Scores (#94th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
16101
File compression 647.3 MB/sec 1300 MB/sec
Clang compilation 76.4 Klines/sec 134.7 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 169.6 pages/sec 374.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 296.9 Mpixels/sec 465.8 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 173 pages/sec 277.2 pages/sec
Background blur 38.9 images/sec 68.3 images/sec
Photo processing 63.4 images/sec 136 images/sec
Ray tracing 16.5 Mpixels/sec 30.1 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 737 & 448 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
37461
Integer math 66.6 GOps/sec 122 GOps/sec
Floating point math 41.3 GOps/sec 90.2 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 54M Primes/sec 153M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 36.6M Strings/sec 50.8M Strings/sec
Data encryption 6.4 GBytes/sec 26.9 GBytes/sec
Data compression 294.7 MBytes/sec 473.1 MBytes/sec
Physics 930 Frames/sec 2245 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 19.4B Matrices/sec 28.6B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 7682 & 5100 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
310.15

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 5.7 PPW 10.3 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 67.9 PPW 128.8 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 148.2 PPW 299.7 PPW
Blender / Watt 1.43 PPW 2.48 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i7 10700K
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-07-10 (Guest #0)Cinebench 202477 / 716
πŸ“˜ 2024-05-04 (Tris)Cinebench 202462 / 415
Intel Core i5 13600K
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Shinigami)Cinebench 2026492 / 5581
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-29 (DSMJohn)Cinebench 2024118 / 1289
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (io)Cinebench 2024114 / 1206
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-09 (stuchi)Cinebench 2024124 / 1248
πŸ“˜ 2024-09-23 (Fireman12402)Cinebench 2024112 / 1258

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i7 10700K and i5 13600K

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released May 1, 2020 September 27, 2022
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Comet Lake Raptor Lake
Model number i7-10700K i5-13600K
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 770
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus - Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus
Intel CPU rating (#60th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 6
P-Threads 16 12
Base Frequency (P) 3.8 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores - 8
E-Threads - 8
Base Frequency (E) - 2.6 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) - 3.9 GHz
Total
Total Cores 8 14
Total Threads 16 20
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 38x 35x
Bus Bandwidth 8 GT/s -
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 256K (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 16MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 14 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 125 W 125 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) - 181 W
Socket LGA-1200 LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (138th and 61st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU Base Clock 350 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1200 MHz 1500 MHz
Shading Units 192 256
TMUs 24 16
ROPs 3 8
Execution Units 24 32
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.5 TFLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR4-2933 - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i7 10700K official page Intel Core i5 13600K official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
10 (13.9%)
62 (86.1%)
Total votes: 72

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i5 13600K or i7 10700K?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!