Intel Core i9 12950HX vs Apple M2

59 out of 100
Intel Core i9 12950HX
VS
57 out of 100
Apple M2

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.3 GHz Intel Core i9 12950HX with 16-cores against the 3.5 GHz Apple M2 with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between M2 and 12950HX
Advantages of Intel Core i9 12950HX
  • Supports up to 128 GB DDR5-4800 RAM
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
Advantages of Apple M2
  • More powerful Apple M2 GPU integrated graphics: 2.9 vs 0.8 TFLOPS
  • More modern manufacturing process – 5 versus 10 nanometers
  • Around 25.6 GB/s (33%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
1282
582
Cinebench Scores (#96th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Apple M2 +2%
2589
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
14264
10122
File compression 1090 MB/sec 1130 MB/sec
Clang compilation 119.5 Klines/sec 80.4 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 338.5 pages/sec 235.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 426.1 Mpixels/sec 266.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 259.2 pages/sec 257.4 pages/sec
Background blur 56.3 images/sec 42.1 images/sec
Photo processing 114.5 images/sec 107 images/sec
Ray tracing 27.9 Mpixels/sec 10.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 387 & 465 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Apple M2 +4%
3883
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
30994
15651
Integer math 105.7 GOps/sec 37 GOps/sec
Floating point math 78 GOps/sec 37.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 132M Primes/sec 174M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 40.3M Strings/sec 23.7M Strings/sec
Data encryption 20.9 GBytes/sec 9.5 GBytes/sec
Data compression 361.3 MBytes/sec 185.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 2060 Frames/sec 1667 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 21.9B Matrices/sec 7.8B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 879 & 4611 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
251.96
109.19

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 23.3 PPW 32.3 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 259.3 PPW 562.3 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 563.5 PPW 869.5 PPW
Blender / Watt 4.58 PPW 6.07 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i9 12950HX
No benchmark results yet
Apple M2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-14 (T)Geekbench 6 CPU2647 / 10245
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-05 (AR)Geekbench 6 CPU2655 / 10211
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-24 (Shivam)Geekbench 6 CPU2619 / 9900

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 12950HX and Apple M2

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released May 10, 2022 June 6, 2022
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv8
Codename Alder Lake Apple M2
Model number i9-12950HX -
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics (32EU) Apple M2 GPU
Successor - Intel Core i9 13950HX - Apple M5 (10-Core)
Intel CPU rating (#91st place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 4
P-Threads 16 4
Base Frequency (P) 2.3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 8 4
E-Threads 8 4
Base Frequency (E) 1.7 GHz 2.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.6 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 16 8
Total Threads 24 8
Bus Frequency 100 MHz -
Multiplier 23x -
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 1280K (per core) 16MB (shared)
L3 Cache 30MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Transistors - 20 billions
Fabrication Process 10 nm 5 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-55 W (configurable) 18 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 157 W -
Socket BGA-1964 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 100Β°C -
Laptop processors ranking (115th and 133rd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) Apple M2 GPU
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 500 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1550 MHz 1398 MHz
Shading Units 256 1024
TMUs 16 64
ROPs 8 32
Execution Units 32 128
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS
Apple M2 +262%
2.9 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-4800
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-6400
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 24 GB
Memory Channels 2 8
Max. Memory Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s 102.4 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i9 12950HX official page -
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
123 (60.6%)
80 (39.4%)
Total votes: 203

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M2 or Intel Core i9 12950HX?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
WoW intel πŸ‘ June 7, 2022 at 02:26 PM
Intel has always managed to make the most powerful processor. If you want a powerful laptop, intel's HX series laptop is for you. I wish the apple market would come out with a good processor, as always, it only stands out with its low power consumption, and it has no other advantage. Buying these "tablet-derived" Apple Macbooks is both ridiculous and unnecessary waste.
+7 Reply
Avatar
No Name June 9, 2022 at 06:19 PM
People don't want a laptop with over 3 KGs and poor battery life. also when you unplug your laptop drops more than 50% performance... not to mention the active-cooling system you have to use to cool that laptop with (RPM 6000 FAN Speed) oh man that noise! if you still want that type of laptop then why not buy a desktop instead? you will get much more performance with it.
+13 Reply
Avatar
No name August 10, 2022 at 10:59 AM
No Name, Because desktops are not portable ... this might be a new idea to you πŸ˜‰
+1 Reply