Intel Core i9 13900KS vs AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.2 GHz Intel Core i9 13900KS with 24-cores against the 4.2 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
๐Ÿ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click โ€œCalculate".
Currency
VS
20.1
(Mediocre)
Value Index
27.0
(Mediocre)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 7950X3D and 13900KS
Advantages of Intel Core i9 13900KS
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • More powerful Intel UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics: 0.8 vs 0.6 TFLOPS
  • More than 11ยฐ C higher critical temperature
  • 5% higher Turbo Boost frequency (6 GHz vs 5.7 GHz)
  • Around 6.4 GB/s (8%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
  • Has 92 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More modern manufacturing process โ€“ 5 versus 10 nanometers

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (15th and 26th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
22073
File compression 1790 MB/sec 1550 MB/sec
Clang compilation 213.7 Klines/sec 228.7 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 564.2 pages/sec 353.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 585.8 Mpixels/sec 482.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 308.9 pages/sec 303.7 pages/sec
Background blur 61.5 images/sec 68.3 images/sec
Photo processing 188.3 images/sec 117.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 48.4 Mpixels/sec 54.7 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] โ€“ 720 & 562 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 210.6 GOps/sec 213.3 GOps/sec
Floating point math 154.3 GOps/sec 130.1 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 256M Primes/sec 492M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 89.8M Strings/sec 93.2M Strings/sec
Data encryption 47.5 GBytes/sec 47 GBytes/sec
Data compression 809.9 MBytes/sec 783.2 MBytes/sec
Physics 3429 Frames/sec 5047 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 47.9B Matrices/sec 58.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] โ€“ 1631 & 6573 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
539.45

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 14.4 PPW 16.7 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 147.2 PPW 158.7 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 402.7 PPW 519.2 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.57 PPW 4.5 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core i9 13900KS
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2024-11-03 (Andrei)Cinebench 202497 / 1576
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-02-03 (TheDude)Cinebench 2024109 / 1803
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-08-23 (HermesGrey)Geekbench 6 CPU2723 / 17081
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-06-28 (JenXay)Cinebench 2024117 / 2062
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-06-08 (Jacob Newman)Cinebench 2024113 / 1958
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-02-19 (Ph1ps)Cinebench 2024111 / 2735

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core i9 13900KS and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 12, 2023 January 4, 2023
Type Desktop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Raptor Lake Zen 4 (Raphael)
Model number i9-13900KS 7950X3D
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics 770 Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - Intel Core i9 13900K
Successor - Intel Core i9 14900KS - AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Intel CPU rating (#10th place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#12th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 16
P-Threads 16 32
Base Frequency (P) 3.2 GHz 4.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 6 GHz 5.7 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 -
E-Threads 16 -
Base Frequency (E) 2.4 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.3 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 16
Total Threads 32 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 32x 42x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 32MB (shared) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 128MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes Yes

Package

Transistors - 13.1 billions
Fabrication Process 10 nm 5 nm
TDP (PL1) 150 W 120 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 253 W 162 W
Socket LGA-1700 AM5
Peak Temperature 100ยฐC 89ยฐC
Desktop CPU ranking (17th and 23rd place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1650 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 256 128
TMUs 16 8
ROPs 8 4
Execution Units 32 2
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
0.8 TFLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- DDR4-3200
- DDR5-5200
Max. Memory Size 192 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 89.6 GB/s 83.2 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i9 13900KS official page AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
505 (50.7%)
491 (49.3%)
Total votes: 996

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D or Intel Core i9 13900KS?
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Not a fan boy! March 10, 2023 at 04:56 PM
I have not tried the AMD CPUs however coming from a 12900K with EVGA 3090 hybrid to the 13900KS I did notice a big step up in performance in MSFS 2020. Not that the GPU didn't help any(Asus Tuf 4090oc) However when looking at the stats FPS, latency, RAM, and GPU usage both on task manager and other apps it shows the higher clock speeds are welcome on this title, I'd say more than the cache. The i9 13900K(s) does have more cache than its predecessor still less than the AMD. But the clock speeds even got rid of the occasional stuttering and a decent uplift in FPS.
+15 Reply
Avatar
im not givin out my name March 20, 2023 at 06:21 PM
can i ask why you would upgrade your cpu when you already have something that fast?
+20 Reply
Avatar
some dude March 2, 2023 at 08:04 PM
Intel is clearly the better processor this time around.
+66 Reply
Avatar
cpu oc March 9, 2023 at 06:01 PM
Yeah, It's quite fast no doubt mine did clock 6ghz out of the box. And during gaming, it hovers around 5.6-5.7ghz. For certain games and sims clock speed means a lot over the 3D cache. I guess both are very very good CPUs and both can do wonders.
+41 Reply
Avatar
im not givin out my name March 9, 2023 at 09:55 PM
actually, very much not, because the 7950x3d obliterates it in gaming, only slightly slower in productivity, nearly 1/3 the power consumption (450 (unlocked) vs 162), and much better socket support.
+11 Reply
Avatar
jack March 22, 2023 at 09:12 AM
im not givin out my name, Not really, the performance is only notably better in gaming on F1 22 and Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with a 12% and 26% lead, respectively. In other games, the advantage is minimal, always less than 5fps. This is due to the use of slower 6000MHz RAM, which limits the i9's performance, considering that it can run at 8000MHz+. This is not something we can say for the 7950X3D. Please note that this is with the 13900K non-S variant, so the small lead in a few benchmarks is bound to get even smaller or be eliminated, if not overturned, on the higher-clocked processor with faster RAM.
+1 Reply
Avatar
jack March 22, 2023 at 09:17 AM
im not givin out my name, Where did you get your TDP data? On this page, it clearly states that it's 253W versus 162W.
+3 Reply
Avatar
speedy January 22, 2023 at 11:54 PM
I think that the L3 cache and in those times were electric bills getting higher the AMD deff wins, with less power usage and pretty darn fast. maybe it will not be faster in all games than intel but it will be most of the time because of this L3 cache. and even when this AMD CPU is like couple % less fast than intel it saves a lot of electric bill costs so overall a winner for me and for their new technology where the intel is just adding things instead of working around getting smarter. I think every company can make things bigger by just adding more GHz and more power usage and everything, but making things smaller but with more speed is what we need in the future.
+19 Reply
Avatar
im not givin out my name February 13, 2023 at 06:09 PM
This is it exactly, my 12600k has massive power consumption and I hate it.
+7 Reply
Avatar
Red January 17, 2023 at 10:09 PM
@bartol875 AMD and Intel are similar in ST and MT In the game, 7950X3D is better than 13900KS.
+32 Reply
Avatar
bartol875 January 13, 2023 at 08:10 AM
I am really used to Intel, so I voted on it, but I understand, why people think AMD is better.
+153 Reply
Avatar
key February 27, 2023 at 08:51 PM
this basically all just which one you like better both are equivalent
+10 Reply