Home > CPU Comparison > Processor N200 or Core i3 N305: what's better?

Intel Processor N200 vs Core i3 N305

24 out of 100
Intel Processor N200
VS
31 out of 100
Intel Core i3 N305
Intel Processor N200
Intel Core i3 N305

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Processor N200 with 4-cores against the 1.8 GHz Core i3 N305 with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
๐Ÿ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between N305 and N200
Advantages of Intel Core i3 N305
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • More powerful Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) integrated graphics: 0.6 vs 0.4 TFLOPS
  • 48% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 1339 vs 903 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Processor N200
vs
Core i3 N305

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Processor N200
2747
Core i3 N305 +92%
5277
File compression 321.5 MB/sec 447.7 MB/sec
Clang compilation 13.4 Klines/sec 41.7 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 72.5 pages/sec 123.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 82.8 Mpixels/sec 162.8 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 98.7 pages/sec 167.4 pages/sec
Background blur 12.5 images/sec 25 images/sec
Photo processing 25.9 images/sec 42.1 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.53 Mpixels/sec 7.03 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] โ€“ 481 & 789 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Processor N200
1743
Core i3 N305 +17%
2040
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Processor N200
4549
Core i3 N305 +106%
9377
Integer math 15.7 GOps/sec 32.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 9.9 GOps/sec 21.9 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 19M Primes/sec 23M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 5.8M Strings/sec 13.8M Strings/sec
Data encryption 3.4 GBytes/sec 7.6 GBytes/sec
Data compression 46.7 MBytes/sec 111 MBytes/sec
Physics 330 Frames/sec 527 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 2.3B Matrices/sec 5.7B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] โ€“ 541 & 1152 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 15.2 PPW 16.1 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 457.8 PPW 351.8 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 758.2 PPW 625.1 PPW
Blender / Watt - 3.88 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Processor N200
No benchmark results yet
Add
Intel Core i3 N305
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-10-13 (Aleman82)GeekBench1264 / 3791
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-10-08 (Kbzabeto82)GeekBench1264 / 3791
Add View all (2)

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Processor N200 and Core i3 N305

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 3, 2023 January 3, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Alder Lake Alder Lake
Model number N200 i3-N305
Integrated GPU UHD Graphics (32 EU) UHD Graphics (32EU)

CPU

Efficient Cores
E-Cores 4 8
E-Threads 4 8
Base Frequency (E) 3.7 GHz 1.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) - 3.9 GHz
Total
Total Cores 4 8
Total Threads 4 8
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 37x 18x
L1 Cache 96K (per core) 96K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (shared) 2MB (shared)
L3 Cache 6MB (shared) 6MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 10 nm 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 6 W 9-15 W (configurable)
Socket BGA-1264 BGA-1744
Peak Temperature 105ยฐC 105ยฐC

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics (32 EU) Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 750 MHz 1250 MHz
Shading Units 256 256
TMUs 16 16
ROPs 8 8
Execution Units 32 32
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
Processor N200
0.4 TFLOPS
Core i3 N305 +50%
0.6 TFLOPS
See: Intel UHD Graphics Xe (32 EU) benchmarks

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-4800
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-4800		 - DDR5-4800
- DDR4-3200
- LPDDR5-4800
Max. Memory Size 16 GB 16 GB
Memory Channels 1 1
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Processor N200 official page Intel Core i3 N305 official page
PCI Express Version 3.0 3.0
PCI Express Lanes 9 9

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
18 (24.7%)
55 (75.3%)
Total votes: 73

Competitors

1. Intel Core i3 N305 vs Intel Processor N100
2. Intel Core i3 N305 vs AMD Ryzen 3 7320U (2)
3. Intel Core i3 N305 vs Intel Core i3 1215U (6)
4. Intel Core i3 N305 vs Intel Core i3 1115G4 (2)
5. Intel Core i3 N305 vs AMD Ryzen 5 7520U (4)
6. Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i3 1115G4
7. Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Processor N100
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core i3 N305 or Processor N200?
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Englishะ ัƒััะบะธะน