Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) vs Adreno X1-45
VS
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
Tiger Lake GT2
Adreno X1-45
Adreno X1
We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) with 80 pipelines and 640 shaders against the 3 years and 3 months newer Adreno X1-45 that utilizes 3 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
- Achieves 43% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (14K vs 9K)
Reasons to consider the Adreno X1-45
- Performs better (up to 26%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21 10 - - |
- |
| The Witcher 3 | 12 9 - - |
- |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16 11 9 - |
- |
| Far Cry 6 | 13 10 - - |
- |
| Hogwarts Legacy | - - - - |
- |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 12 12 10 - |
- |
| Ghost of Tsushima | 9 - - - |
- |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12 12 - - |
- |
| 1080p High | 12 | - |
| 1080p Ultra | 9 | - |
| 1440p Ultra | - | - |
| 4K Ultra | - | - |
| Margin of Error | Medium | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 1230 | 928 |
| Solar Bay | - | 5990 |
| Fire Strike | 4196 | 3707 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 2124 | 3225 |
| Night Raid | 15167 | 16550 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 31 img/sec | 14.2 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 23.3 img/sec | 6.82 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 0.61 Gpixels/sec | 0.56 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 0.87 Gpixels/sec | 0.65 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 0.36 Gpixels/sec | 0.55 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.15 Gpixels/sec | 0.12 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 36.1 Gpixels/sec | 26.6 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 2493.2 FPS | 1746.7 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 392 | 349 |
| DirectX 11 | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 12 FPS | 10 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 1158 Ops/s | 810 Ops/s |
Recent User Tests
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
No benchmark results yet
Adreno X1-45
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-03-18 (Rennsport) | GeekBench | 9564 |
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 1149 | - |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 1796 | - |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 1394 | - |
| Face Detection (HP) | 2775 | - |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 5476 | - |
| Text Classification (SP) | 981 | - |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 905 | - |
| Object Detection (SP) | 1277 | - |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 3737 | - |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 22348 | - |
| Framework | ONNX | - |
| Backend | DirectML | - |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) and Adreno X1-45General
| Vendor | Intel | Qualcomm |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Released | August 15, 2020 | October 24, 2023 |
| Case | Laptop | Laptop |
| Purpose | Generic | Generic |
| Segment | Entry-level | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Adreno X1 |
| GPU Codename | Tiger Lake GT2 | Adreno X1 |
| Rival Equivalent | - | - Apple M2 GPU (8-core) |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core i5 1130G7 or above | - Qualcomm Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) or above |
| Used in CPUs | - Intel Core 5 220U - Intel Core 5 220H - Intel Core i5 1334U - Intel Core 5 120U - Intel Core i5 1335U - Intel Core i5 1345U - Intel Core i5 1340P - Intel Core i5 13500H - and 14 more |
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-42-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-46-100) |
Laptop GPU ranking (132nd and 105th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 280 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 850-1500 MHz (configurable) | 1107-1367 MHz (configurable) |
| Shading Units | 640 | 768 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 40 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 20 | 24 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 80 | 3 |
| Tensor Cores | No | - |
| Ray-tracing Cores | No | - |
| L1 Cache | - | 192KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 1024KB shared | 1MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 17-30 GPixel/s | 27-33 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 34-60 GTexel/s | 53-66 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| TGP | 15 W | - |
| Manufacturing | Intel | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die Size | 146 mm² | - |
Memory
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Memory Size | System RAM Dependent | - |
| Memory Clock | System RAM Dependent | - |
| Effective Memory Speed | System RAM Dependent | - |
| ECC | No | - |
API
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.2 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | - | No |
| Ray Tracing | No | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | - | 1.4 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 15