Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) vs Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) with 80 pipelines and 640 shaders against the 3 years and 10 months newer Apple M4 GPU (10-Core) that utilizes 160 pipelines and 1280 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M4 GPU (10-Core) over Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
Reasons to consider the Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 4.8x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • 2x higher maximum theoretical performance (3.8 vs 1.9 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 2.6x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (37K vs 14K)
  • Has 2x more shading units (1280 vs 640)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
21
10
-
-
-
The Witcher 3
12
9
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
16
11
9
-
-
Far Cry 6
13
10
-
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
-
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
12
12
10
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
9
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
12
12
-
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 12 -
1080p Ultra 9 -
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Medium Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 1230 -
Solar Bay - 16554
Fire Strike 4196 -
Wild Life Extreme 2124 9610
Night Raid 15167 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 31 img/sec 72.2 img/sec
Face Detection 23.3 img/sec 48.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.61 Gpixels/sec 1.4 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.87 Gpixels/sec 1.94 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.36 Gpixels/sec 1.5 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.53 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 36.1 Gpixels/sec 123.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2493.2 FPS 4938.4 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G2D Mark 392 -
DirectX 11 16 FPS -
DirectX 12 12 FPS -
GPU Compute 1158 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 69410 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Sources: Blender [9] – 551 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1149 4874
Image Segmentation (HP) 1796 8168
Image Super Resolution (Q) 1394 11983
Face Detection (HP) 2775 17036
Pose Estimation (Q) 5476 31171
Text Classification (SP) 981 2964
Machine Translation (HP) 905 3410
Object Detection (SP) 1277 5112
Depth Estimation (Q) 3737 22700
Style Transfer (SP) 22348 60872
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) and Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released August 15, 2020 May 7, 2024
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture Generation 12.1 Apple M GPU
GPU Codename Tiger Lake GT2 Custom
Rival Equivalent - - Adreno X1-85
Successor - - Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i5 1130G7 or above - Apple M4 (10-Core) or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core 5 220U
- Intel Core 5 220H
- Intel Core i5 1334U
- Intel Core 5 120U
- Intel Core i5 1335U
- Intel Core i5 1345U
- Intel Core i5 1340P
- Intel Core i5 13500H
- and 14 more
- Apple M4 (10-Core)
Laptop GPU ranking (134th and 73rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 500 MHz
Boost Clock 850-1500 MHz (configurable) 1470 MHz
Shading Units 640 1280
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 40 80
Render Output Units (ROPs) 20 40
Compute Units (Pipelines) 80 160
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores No -
L2 Cache 1024KB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 17-30 GPixel/s 59 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 34-60 GTexel/s 118 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
3.8 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Ring Bus Custom
TGP 15 W 18 W
Manufacturing Intel TSMC
Fabrication Process 10 nm 3 nm
Die Size 146 mm² -
Transistor Count - 28 billion
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size System RAM Dependent -
Memory Clock System RAM Dependent 7500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed System RAM Dependent 15000 Mbps
Bus - 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.2 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 2.1 -
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
4 (100%)
Total votes: 4

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!