AMD Radeon 680M vs GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

We performed a head-to-head comparison of the Radeon 680M with 12 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 1 year older GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile 4 GB that utilizes 16 pipelines and 2048 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version -

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 3050 Mobile over Radeon 680M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 680M
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.3x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Includes 4 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory
  • 92% higher maximum theoretical performance (7.1 vs 3.7 TFLOPS)
  • Supports Nvidia DLSS 2 technology
  • Achieves 2x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (58K vs 28K)
  • Has 2.7x more shading units (2048 vs 768)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5 -
75
44
34
21
The Witcher 3 -
68
53
38
20
Counter-Strike 2 -
115
80
54
23
Far Cry 6 -
60
52
40
17
Hogwarts Legacy -
37
28
23
12
CoD: Modern Warfare III -
48
37
27
16
Ghost of Tsushima -
37
28
18
10
Cyberpunk 2077 -
36
35
19
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider -
66
62
39
18
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High - 60
1080p Ultra - 47
1440p Ultra - 32
4K Ultra - 16
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
4911
Time Spy 2327 4884
Solar Bay 9712 21596
Port Royal 1008 552
Fire Strike 6903 12571
Wild Life Extreme 4163 9400
Night Raid 27534 53685
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
28675
58733
Background Blur 73.8 img/sec 88.6 img/sec
Face Detection 30.1 img/sec 57.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.93 Gpixels/sec 2.53 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.17 Gpixels/sec 3.33 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.17 Gpixels/sec 2.55 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.76 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 105 Gpixels/sec 256.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 4640 FPS 7465.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
9506
G2D Mark 723 493
DirectX 11 40 FPS 71 FPS
DirectX 12 21 FPS 46 FPS
GPU Compute 2006 Ops/s 3868 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 176 & 20037 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
238.39
1154.04
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 12 & 1497 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 680M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-08 (Wahyu)Geekbench 6 OpenCL26880
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-31 (bobschieffer)Geekbench 6 OpenCL61418
📘 2026-08-29 (bobschieffer)Cinebench 20243654
📘 2026-08-13 -> Kushagra_AggarwalSteel Nomad Light5735
📘 2026-01-26 (rar)Geekbench 6 OpenCL68364

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
10038
GB6 ML Half Precision
19152
GB6 ML Quantized
6984
Image Classification (SP) 1976 4349
Image Segmentation (HP) 3138 11416
Image Super Resolution (Q) 6693 8973
Face Detection (HP) 7213 18927
Pose Estimation (Q) 21849 34631
Text Classification (SP) 1497 2269
Machine Translation (HP) 2579 3539
Object Detection (SP) 2154 5046
Depth Estimation (Q) 9635 15772
Style Transfer (SP) 56269 75260
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 680M and GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop

General

Vendor Amd Nvidia
Build Integrated Discrete
Released January 1, 2022 January 1, 2021
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Gaming
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Ampere
GPU Codename Rembrandt GA107
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX Vega 8 -
Successor - Radeon 8050S - GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 6800H or above -
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 7 170
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7736U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800U​
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
- and 2 more
-
Laptop GPU ranking (104th and 93rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 712-1530 MHz (configurable)
Boost Clock 2200-2400 MHz (configurable) 1057-1740 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 768 2048
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 64
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 40
Compute Units (Pipelines) 12 16
Tensor Cores - 64
Ray-tracing Cores 12 16
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 70-77 GPixel/s 42-70 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 106-115 GTexel/s 68-111 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
3.4-3.7 TFLOPS
4.3-7.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 15 W 35-95 W (configurable)
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Fabrication Process 6 nm 8 nm
Die Size 208 mm² 200 mm²
Transistor Count 13.1 billion 8.7 billion
Transistor Density 62.98 MTr/mm² 43.5 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type System Shared GDDR6
Memory Size - 4 GB
Memory Clock - 1500 MHz
Effective Memory Speed - 12000 Mbps
Bus - 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 3.0
CUDA - 8.6
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No DLSS 2
DisplayPort - 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
20 (37.7%)
33 (62.3%)
Total votes: 53

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!