Radeon RX Vega 8 vs Radeon 680M

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon RX Vega 8 with 8 pipelines and 512 shaders against the 3 years and 11 months newer Radeon 680M that utilizes 12 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Radeon 680M over RX Vega 8
Reasons to consider the Radeon 680M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 70%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 68% higher maximum theoretical performance (3.7 vs 2.2 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
  • Ray-tracing support with 12 dedicated RT cores
  • Achieves 2.7x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (28K vs 10K)
  • Has 50% more shading units (768 vs 512)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
25
11
10
-
-
The Witcher 3
9
10
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
27
16
12
-
-
Far Cry 6
20
17
10
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
11
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
22
17
14
-
-
Ghost of Tsushima
12
9
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
-
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
14
13
10
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 16 -
1080p Ultra 12 -
1440p Ultra 9 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
1261
2140
Time Spy 1410 2327
Solar Bay - 9712
Port Royal - 1008
Fire Strike 4497 6903
Wild Life Extreme 2532 4163
Night Raid 18010 27534
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
10472
Radeon 680M +174%
28675
Background Blur 21.2 img/sec 73.8 img/sec
Face Detection 10.9 img/sec 30.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.34 Gpixels/sec 0.93 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.65 Gpixels/sec 1.17 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.51 Gpixels/sec 1.17 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.37 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 34.9 Gpixels/sec 105 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 1322.9 FPS 4640 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
1562
Radeon 680M +185%
4444
G2D Mark 398 723
DirectX 11 10 FPS 40 FPS
DirectX 12 8 FPS 21 FPS
GPU Compute 861 Ops/s 2006 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 10003 & 176 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
n/a
238.39
Sources: Blender [9] – 12 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon RX Vega 8
No benchmark results yet
Radeon 680M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-08 (Wahyu)Geekbench 6 OpenCL26880

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
2257
Radeon 680M +158%
5834
GB6 ML Half Precision
2817
Radeon 680M +191%
8202
GB6 ML Quantized
1643
Radeon 680M +154%
4169
Image Classification (SP) 924 1976
Image Segmentation (HP) 1148 3138
Image Super Resolution (Q) 2211 6693
Face Detection (HP) 2819 7213
Pose Estimation (Q) 7106 21849
Text Classification (SP) 832 1497
Machine Translation (HP) 1021 2579
Object Detection (SP) 1040 2154
Depth Estimation (Q) 3885 9635
Style Transfer (SP) 14495 56269
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon RX Vega 8 and Radeon 680M

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Build Integrated Integrated
Released February 13, 2018 January 1, 2022
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture GCN 5.0 RDNA 2.0
GPU Codename Raven Rembrandt
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon RX Vega 8
Successor - - Radeon 8050S
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 4800U or above - AMD Ryzen 7 6800H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
- AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
- AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX
- AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
- AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
- and 8 more
- AMD Ryzen 7 170
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7736U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800U​
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
- and 2 more
Laptop GPU ranking (127th and 104th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 400 MHz
Boost Clock 1100-2100 MHz (configurable) 2200-2400 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 512 768
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 32 48
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 8 12
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores No 12
L1 Cache - 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache - 2MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 9-17 GPixel/s 70-77 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 35-67 GTexel/s 106-115 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
1.1-2.2 TFLOPS
3.4-3.7 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface IGP PCIe 4.0 x8
TGP 25 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 7 nm 6 nm
Die Size 210 mm² 208 mm²
Transistor Count 4.94 billion 13.1 billion
Transistor Density 23.52 MTr/mm² 62.98 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size System RAM Dependent -
Memory Clock System RAM Dependent -
Effective Memory Speed System RAM Dependent -
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
Ray Tracing No Yes
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
8 (15.7%)
43 (84.3%)
Total votes: 51

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!