AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 680M with 12 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 1 year and 5 months older Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) that utilizes 96 pipelines and 768 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) over Radeon 680M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 680M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.4x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 6 nm process technology
  • 54% higher maximum theoretical performance (3.7 vs 2.4 TFLOPS)
  • Achieves 66% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (28K vs 17K)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5 -
21
11
-
-
The Witcher 3 -
12
11
-
-
Counter-Strike 2 -
19
12
9
-
Far Cry 6 -
14
11
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy -
9
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III -
14
12
10
-
Ghost of Tsushima -
11
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077 -
-
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider -
15
13
9
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High - 14
1080p Ultra - 10
1440p Ultra - -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 2327 1282
Solar Bay 9712 -
Port Royal 1008 -
Fire Strike 6903 4411
Wild Life Extreme 4163 3119
Night Raid 27534 14097
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 73.8 img/sec 34.5 img/sec
Face Detection 30.1 img/sec 27.4 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.93 Gpixels/sec 0.75 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.17 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.17 Gpixels/sec 0.39 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.37 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 105 Gpixels/sec 55.6 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 4640 FPS 3061.7 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 723 -
DirectX 11 40 FPS -
DirectX 12 21 FPS -
GPU Compute 2006 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 176 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 12 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 680M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-08 (Wahyu)Geekbench 6 OpenCL26880
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-25 -> op1Geekbench 6 OpenCL16849
📘 2026-07-25 -> sevensraysGeekbench 6 OpenCL16620
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekbench 6 OpenCL15810

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 1976 1428
Image Segmentation (HP) 3138 2420
Image Super Resolution (Q) 6693 1551
Face Detection (HP) 7213 3685
Pose Estimation (Q) 21849 6255
Text Classification (SP) 1497 938
Machine Translation (HP) 2579 1028
Object Detection (SP) 2154 1581
Depth Estimation (Q) 9635 4305
Style Transfer (SP) 56269 26119
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 680M and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 1, 2022 August 15, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 2.0 Generation 12.1
GPU Codename Rembrandt Tiger Lake GT2
Rival Equivalent - Radeon RX Vega 8 -
Successor - Radeon 8050S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 6800H or above - Intel Core i7 1160G7 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 7 170
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7736U
- AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800U​
- AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
- AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
- and 2 more
- Intel Core 7 250H
- Intel Core 9 270H
- Intel Core 7 150U
- Intel Core i7 13705H
- Intel Core i9 13905H
- Intel Core i7 1355U
- Intel Core i7 1365U
- Intel Core i7 1360P
- and 23 more
Laptop GPU ranking (104th and 125th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2200-2400 MHz (configurable) 950-1550 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 768 768
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 48
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 24
Compute Units (Pipelines) 12 96
Ray-tracing Cores 12 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared 1024KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 70-77 GPixel/s 23-37 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 106-115 GTexel/s 46-74 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
3.4-3.7 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 6 nm 10 nm
Die Size 208 mm² 146 mm²
Transistor Count 13.1 billion -
Transistor Density 62.98 MTr/mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size - System RAM Dependent
Memory Clock - System RAM Dependent
Effective Memory Speed - System RAM Dependent
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.2 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
33 (89.2%)
4 (10.8%)
Total votes: 37

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Jensen Manning March 1, 2026 at 01:43 AM
Sorry man, on paper it seem one is slighly better but to the eyes, the differences is less than 3%.....lol.
+5 Reply