AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 760M with 8 pipelines and 512 shaders against the 2 years and 5 months older Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) that utilizes 80 pipelines and 640 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU) over Radeon 760M
Reasons to consider the Radeon 760M
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.4x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 4 nm process technology
  • Shows 2.2x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 13 vs 6 FPS
  • 53% higher maximum theoretical performance (2.9 vs 1.9 TFLOPS)
  • Ray-tracing support with 6 dedicated RT cores
  • Achieves 59% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (22K vs 14K)
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)
  • Has 25% more shading units (640 vs 512)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
41
21
17
9
21
10
-
-
The Witcher 3
19
19
9
-
12
9
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
35
23
19
-
16
11
9
-
Far Cry 6
32
24
19
-
13
10
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
15
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
28
24
17
10
12
12
10
-
Ghost of Tsushima
19
11
9
-
9
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
14
16
9
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
26
23
14
-
12
12
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 25 12
1080p Ultra 19 9
1440p Ultra 13 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low Medium

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 2372 1230
Solar Bay 9378 -
Port Royal 975 -
Fire Strike 7074 4196
Wild Life Extreme 4630 2124
Night Raid 29486 15167
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Background Blur 57.8 img/sec 31 img/sec
Face Detection 28.7 img/sec 23.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.8 Gpixels/sec 0.61 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1 Gpixels/sec 0.87 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.82 Gpixels/sec 0.36 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 85.4 Gpixels/sec 36.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2844.5 FPS 2493.2 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 890 392
DirectX 11 52 FPS 16 FPS
DirectX 12 25 FPS 12 FPS
GPU Compute 2838 Ops/s 1158 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 2585 & 69410 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 35 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 3449 1149
Image Segmentation (HP) 4098 1796
Image Super Resolution (Q) 7937 1394
Face Detection (HP) 12168 2775
Pose Estimation (Q) 29915 5476
Text Classification (SP) 2571 981
Machine Translation (HP) 3852 905
Object Detection (SP) 2687 1277
Depth Estimation (Q) 14163 3737
Style Transfer (SP) 59966 22348
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 760M and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 4, 2023 August 15, 2020
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Generation 12.1
GPU Codename Phoenix Tiger Lake GT2
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc iGPU (4-Cores) -
Successor - Radeon 8040S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 5 7640U or above - Intel Core i5 1130G7 or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 5 230
- AMD Ryzen 5 240
- AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
- AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
- AMD Ryzen 5 8640U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
- AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Intel Core 5 220U
- Intel Core 5 220H
- Intel Core i5 1334U
- Intel Core 5 120U
- Intel Core i5 1335U
- Intel Core i5 1345U
- Intel Core i5 1340P
- Intel Core i5 13500H
- and 14 more
Laptop GPU ranking (111th and 133rd place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 800 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2600-2800 MHz (configurable) 850-1500 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 512 640
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 32 40
Render Output Units (ROPs) 16 20
Compute Units (Pipelines) 8 80
Tensor Cores - No
Ray-tracing Cores 6 No
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared 1024KB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 42-45 GPixel/s 17-30 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 83-90 GTexel/s 34-60 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
2.7-2.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 15 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 4 nm 10 nm
Die Size 178 mm² 146 mm²
Transistor Count 25.4 billion -
Transistor Density 142.7 MTr/mm² -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Size - System RAM Dependent
Memory Clock - System RAM Dependent
Effective Memory Speed - System RAM Dependent
ECC - No

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 2.1
Ray Tracing Yes No
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
17 (94.4%)
1 (5.6%)
Total votes: 18

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!