A16 Bionic vs A14 Bionic

We compared two 6-core processors: Apple A16 Bionic (with Apple A16 GPU graphics) and A14 Bionic (Apple A14 GPU). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
  • Performs 2.7x better in floating-point computations
  • Supports 50% higher memory bandwidth (51.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 23%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1626K vs 1326K
  • 12% higher CPU clock speed (3460 vs 3100 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~9%)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
A16 Bionic +23%
1626008
1326975
CPU 432740 364692
GPU 490354 311592
Memory 216774 180518
UX 486140 470169
Total score 1626008 1326975
Samples [36 tests] [55 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A16 Bionic +26%
2631
2095
Multi-Core Score
A16 Bionic +25%
6602
5297
Asset compression 234.4 MB/sec 182.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 155.2 pages/sec 110.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 157.5 Mpixels/sec 123.2 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 149.7 images/sec 104.9 images/sec
HDR 202.6 Mpixels/sec 164.1 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 25.9 images/sec 19.1 images/sec
Photo processing 76.8 images/sec 50.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 6.74 Mpixels/sec 5.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 24 tests 22 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A16 Bionic +36%
22851
16822
Background blur 39.5 images/sec 27.6 images/sec
Face detection 50.9 images/sec 35.2 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.73 Gpixels/sec 0.54 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 1.05 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 1.22 Gpixels/sec 0.83 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.29 Gpixels/sec 0.24 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 70.4 Gpixels/sec 50.5 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2162.5 FPS 1772.1 FPS
API Metal Metal
Samples 12 tests 17 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Solar Bay
A16 Bionic +54%
4266
2767
Score 4266 2767
Stability 74% 85%
Graphics test 16 FPS 11 FPS
Section 1 20 FPS 13 FPS
Section 2 16 FPS 10 FPS
Section 3 12 FPS 8 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
A16 Bionic +50%
3335
2229
Score 3335 2229
Stability 71% 86%
Graphics test 19 FPS 13 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple A16 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-21 (Атомная Π±ΠΎΠΌΠ±Π°)AnTuTu 111772840
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Bear lover)AnTuTu 111714105
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-14 (ZUSEPRO)AnTuTu 111603687
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (LORDroid)AnTuTu 111445126
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (Ronaldo)AnTuTu 111626008
Apple A14 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-04 (Stelle)AnTuTu 111288870
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 (Kirious)AnTuTu 111251875
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 (Kirious)AnTuTu 111251875
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Kirillkryt)AnTuTu 111284629
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 (Ad_545)AnTuTu 111216748

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of A16 Bionic and A14 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
2x 3.1 GHz – Firestorm
4x 1.8 GHz – Icestorm
Cores 6 6
Frequency 3460 MHz 3100 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.6-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache 256 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 16 MB 8 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count 16 billion 11.8 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 6 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Apple A16 GPU Apple A14 GPU
Architecture Apple Bionic GPU Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 1398 MHz 1278 MHz
Pipelines 5 4
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 640 256
FLOPS 1789.4 Gigaflops 654.3 Gigaflops

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Apple Neural Engine Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance 17 TOPS 11 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 51.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 6 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type NVMe NVMe
Max display resolution 2796 x 1290 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP -
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
- H.264
- H.265
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced September 2022 September 2020
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number APL1W10 APL1W01
Successor - Apple A19 Pro - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
661 (64.2%)
368 (35.8%)
Total votes: 1029

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A14 Bionic and A16 Bionic, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Potato May 19, 2025 at 02:25 PM
At this point, either of these are good, its more about how fast and how much memory they have available. If talking 4GB vs 6\8GB, then the difference is very noticeable.
+15 Reply
Avatar
vqq April 27, 2025 at 06:08 PM
Ok good ig? Not a bad processor
+2 Reply