Tensor G3 vs A15 Bionic

We compared the 9-core Google Tensor G3 (Mali-G715 MP7) with the older 6-core Apple A15 Bionic (Apple A15 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Google Tensor G3
  • Supports 100% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 34.1 GB/s)
  • Has 3 more cores
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 5 nm)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A15 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~50%)
  • 11% higher CPU clock speed (3230 vs 2910 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1409016
1413275
CPU 482403 410975
GPU 384611 370837
Memory 218603 164151
UX 323399 467312
Total score 1409016 1413275
Samples [33 tests] [69 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1722
A15 Bionic +34%
2315
Multi-Core Score
4458
A15 Bionic +29%
5753
Asset compression 197.6 MB/sec 208.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 134.7 pages/sec 122.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 148.4 Mpixels/sec 139.1 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 82.1 images/sec 125.1 images/sec
HDR 142.1 Mpixels/sec 179.4 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 13.2 images/sec 22.3 images/sec
Photo processing 48.4 images/sec 53.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.34 Mpixels/sec 6.26 Mpixels/sec
Samples 11 tests 37 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
8076
A15 Bionic +153%
20400
Background blur 10.6 images/sec 35.4 images/sec
Face detection 6.85 images/sec 44.8 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.16 Gpixels/sec 0.62 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.35 Gpixels/sec 0.82 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.32 Gpixels/sec 0.84 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.08 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 11.9 Gpixels/sec 71.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 1088 FPS 2198.2 FPS
API Vulkan Metal
Samples 9 tests 19 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 982 -
Stability 74% -
Graphics test 7 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
Score - 3765
Stability - 71%
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Section 1 - 19 FPS
Section 2 - 14 FPS
Section 3 - 9 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 2854
Stability - 76%
Graphics test - 17 FPS

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Google Tensor G3
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (Karlik)AnTuTu 121408420
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (asfiii-malik)AnTuTu 111515235
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-28 (asfiii-baloch)AnTuTu 111515235
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-05 (s1mpick)AnTuTu 111338293
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (reazz)AnTuTu 111356451
Apple A15 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-14 (Makkar)AnTuTu 111191717
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-12 -> HotPowerGeekbench 7 CPU2155 / 5548
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (Hoz4ik)AnTuTu 111127460
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-25 -> op1Geekbench 6 CPU2168 / 4988
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-23 -> HotPowerAnTuTu 111184759

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Tensor G3 and A15 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
2x 3.23 GHz – Avalanche
4x 2.02 GHz – Blizzard
Cores 9 6
Frequency 2910 MHz 3230 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.5-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 12 MB
Process 4 nanometers 5 nanometers
Transistor count - 15 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 6 W 6 W
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G715 MP7 Apple A15 GPU
Architecture Valhall 4th gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 890 MHz 1338 MHz
Pipelines 7 5
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 896 640
FLOPS 1594.8 Gigaflops 1712.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 2.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 15.8 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 34.1 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2732 x 2048
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP -
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Exynos 5300i -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7300 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3700 Mbps Up to 3000 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced October 2023 September 2021
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number GS301 (S5P9865) APL1W07
Official page Google Tensor G3 official site -
Successor - Google Tensor G5 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
104 (35.5%)
189 (64.5%)
Total votes: 293

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A15 Bionic and Tensor G3, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Simion June 22, 2024 at 03:23 PM
Would be nice to have raw numbers for memory speed. Thanks
0 Reply
Avatar
Adrian December 21, 2023 at 11:05 PM
I have no idea how Apple's two-year-old chip still surpasses a brand-new Google Tensor chip.
+13 Reply
Avatar
Ghazi December 30, 2023 at 10:59 AM
Tensor G3 was never meant to be a benchmark powerhouse.
+16 Reply
Avatar
TEK December 30, 2023 at 11:10 AM
Manufacturing: Samsung VS TSMC TSMC > Samsung
+9 Reply