Home > Smartphone processors comparison > Dimensity 7300 vs Dimensity 7200 Ultra – what's better?

Dimensity 7300 vs Dimensity 7200 Ultra

Dimensity 7300
VS
Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Dimensity 7300
Dimensity 7200 Ultra

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (with Mali-G615 MP2 graphics) and 7200 Ultra (Mali-G610 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Benchmarks
  4. AnTuTu v11
  5. GeekBench 6
  6. Specs
  7. Comments (6)

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
  • 12% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Higher GPU frequency (~8%)
  • Shows better (up to 14%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1003K vs 879K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Dimensity 7300
vs
Dimensity 7200 Ultra

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Dimensity 7300
879714
Dimensity 7200 Ultra +14%
1003078
CPU 320191 382694
GPU 128437 164972
Memory 164451 177265
UX 266635 278147
Total score 879714 1003078
Samples [311 tests] [40 tests]
Submit your AnTuTu result

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 166 MB/sec 124.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 68.3 pages/sec 83.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 114.8 Mpixels/sec 88.4 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 53.4 images/sec 52.5 images/sec
HDR 102.1 Mpixels/sec 81.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.7 images/sec 8.77 images/sec
Photo processing 25.8 images/sec 22.5 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.62 Mpixels/sec 3.32 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 14 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.57 images/sec 4.84 images/sec
Face detection 2.52 images/sec 2.62 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.2 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.25 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.15 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.06 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.25 Gpixels/sec 8.15 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 439.4 FPS 741.3 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples 40 tests 6 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 346 463
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1179
Graphics test - 7 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13221 -
Video editing score 6420 -
Data manipulation score 9644 -
Photo editing score 35886 -
Writing score 16658 -
Phones tested 22 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-08 (Archit)AnTuTu 12956137
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-07 (Aryak0~0)AnTuTu 121036889
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-06 (Dwanascie78)AnTuTu 11881588
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 -> MilomichaelphAnTuTu 11914149
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Gladly)AnTuTu 121024337
Add View all (367)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-04 (MineUS)AnTuTu 111023280
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (0rin)AnTuTu 111009666
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-24 (Toriq albar)AnTuTu 111041446
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Oleg)AnTuTu 111039401
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-15 (Akkawin)AnTuTu 111005290
Add View all (59)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 7300 and Dimensity 7200 Ultra

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55		 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2500 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G615 MP2 Mali-G610 MP4
Architecture Valhall 4rd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 1047 MHz 1130 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 536.1 Gigaflops 578.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 655 MediaTek APU 650

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9		 - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3		 - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support - LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3270 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2024 September 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6878 MT6878V/ZA MT6878V_A/ZA -
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 7300 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 7400 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
202 (27.9%)
523 (72.1%)
Total votes: 725

Related Comparisons

1. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (11)
2. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (37)
3. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
4. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (1)
5. MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (12)
6. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (18)
7. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (2)
8. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (24)
9. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (12)
10. MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (29)
Compare other chipsets (190+)

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7200 Ultra and Dimensity 7300, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Smj January 2, 2025 at 02:20 AM
Why buy 7200 at more price when u get 7300 in realme 70 turbo u get avg -85 fps stable in free fire,80 fps - battle ground,cod Surprisingly CMF 1- unlocked above 90fps in battle ground
+29 Reply
Avatar
Fadd July 8, 2024 at 04:16 PM
Why use older Cortex A78 and use bigger number than the older Dimensity 7200? Should name this 7100 Plus/Pro/Max
+14 Reply
Avatar
fuuk1 July 29, 2024 at 01:17 PM
They didn't have a SoC named 7100, but that doesn't mean they should just release it with that name because the new SoC is supposed to release in the Dimensity 7000 series. However, they don't want to outright tell everyone that they have a convoluted, misleading naming scheme so these things can sell. Anyways, there's a 7350 coming, which is supposed to be the actual successor of 7200. Don't know if they're going to do an ultra version for this one too, but they definitely seem lazy with the 7350 from the looks of it. They've clocked the A715 cores at 3 GHz, with a new NPU that might be better than both 7300 and 7200. The GPU might be clocked higher too; that's it? The rest are the same on the 7350 compared to the 7200. I noticed this from the paper specs posted on MediaTek's site and there's nothing posted about a 2A Plus phone revealing the SoC on Twitter. I might be proven wrong, though. The 7350 might actually be better.
+3 Reply
Avatar
erbowe December 5, 2025 at 02:28 PM
A78 is still more efficient than A715. Same with GPU side.
+2 Reply
Avatar
King Miracle. July 4, 2024 at 03:04 PM
What MediaTek did wasn't to improve performance, but stability. The Dimensity 7300 is a More stable option than the 7200. The Cortex A715 is known for throttling!
+52 Reply
Avatar
Rolly Ghiz December 5, 2024 at 03:32 PM
At the expense of our pockets?! I mean, it's obviously more expensive, right?
+9 Reply
EnglishРусский