Dimensity 7400 vs Dimensity 7200

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (with Mali-G615 MP2 graphics) and Dimensity 7200 (Mali-G610 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7400
  • Higher GPU frequency (~15%)
  • Performs 15% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7200
  • 8% higher CPU clock speed (2800 vs 2600 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
971424
CPU 330821 362430
GPU 152140 148984
Memory 180552 169068
UX 289637 290942
Total score 953150 971424
Samples [91 tests] [37 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 171.3 MB/sec 127.3 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 80.9 pages/sec 73.9 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 119.6 Mpixels/sec 86.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 64.9 images/sec 42.2 images/sec
HDR 102.1 Mpixels/sec 76.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 11 images/sec 8.69 images/sec
Photo processing 29.1 images/sec 21.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.38 Mpixels/sec 3.36 Mpixels/sec
Samples 19 tests 7 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 5.04 images/sec 5.06 images/sec
Face detection 2.48 images/sec 2.89 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.19 Gpixels/sec 0.25 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.15 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.06 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 5.23 Gpixels/sec 10.3 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 553.7 FPS 909.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 17 tests 4 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 406 447
Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 1158
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 6 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 17072 -
Video editing score 7954 -
Data manipulation score 10959 -
Photo editing score 32413 -
Writing score 18714 -
Phones tested 7 models -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 7400
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 -> JudeSYFMAnTuTu986696
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 -> Junior_escalant3AnTuTu926931
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Ivry)AnTuTu949836
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-02 (Ujan)AnTuTu882542
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-01 (Ko)AnTuTu896448
MediaTek Dimensity 7200
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 (Tushar Ranjan Sharma)AnTuTu980070
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (PratikπŸ‘€πŸ’—)AnTuTu964788
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-16 (Mushraf)AnTuTu1003769
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (note8techh)AnTuTu984744
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-30 -> HuuPhatAnTuTu996454

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 7400 and Dimensity 7200

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2600 MHz 2800 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G615 MP2 Mali-G610 MP4
Architecture Valhall 4rd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU frequency 1300 MHz 1130 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 128 64
Total shaders 256 256
FLOPS 665.6 Gigaflops 578.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 655 MediaTek APU 650

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support - LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3270 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced February 2025 February 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number - MT6886
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 7400 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7200 official site
Successor - - MediaTek Dimensity 7400

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
57 (30.5%)
130 (69.5%)
Total votes: 187

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7200 and Dimensity 7400, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
7200usr June 23, 2026 at 03:34 PM
Although I don't what dm7300 perfomece is 7200 is bad at codm struggles to maintain 60fps on codm br although it's somewhat 90 on mp
+4 Reply
Avatar
7200user2 August 12, 2026 at 05:53 AM
You're right ,it is struggling with 60fps Codm the best you can go is 50fps for the best stability, or bear with framedrop in both mp and br(60-90fps setting)
0 Reply
Avatar
Sipun Nayak April 13, 2025 at 02:54 AM
MTD 7200 best gaming , But I wise unlock 90 FPS
+19 Reply