Dimensity 9200 vs A16 Bionic

We compared the 8-core MediaTek Dimensity 9200 (Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11) with the older 6-core Apple A16 Bionic (Apple A16 GPU) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9200
  • Performs 54% better in floating-point computations
  • Has 2 more cores
  • Supports 33% higher memory bandwidth (68.2 against 51.2 GB/s)
  • Shows better (up to 8%) AnTuTu 11 score โ€“ 1755K vs 1626K
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of Apple A16 Bionic
  • Higher GPU frequency (~43%)
  • 13% higher CPU clock speed (3460 vs 3050 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1755232
1626008
CPU 549345 432740
GPU 500902 490354
Memory 271291 216774
UX 433694 486140
Total score 1755232 1626008
Samples [4 tests] [36 tests]
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores.

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
A16 Bionic +51%
2631
Multi-Core Score
A16 Bionic +52%
6602
Asset compression 204.3 MB/sec 234.4 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 147 pages/sec 155.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 170.8 Mpixels/sec 157.5 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 127.6 images/sec 149.7 images/sec
HDR 153.7 Mpixels/sec 202.6 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 16.9 images/sec 25.9 images/sec
Photo processing 44.2 images/sec 76.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 5.32 Mpixels/sec 6.74 Mpixels/sec
Samples 3 tests 24 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
A16 Bionic +131%
22851
Background blur 15.8 images/sec 39.5 images/sec
Face detection 7.83 images/sec 50.9 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.47 Gpixels/sec 0.73 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.57 Gpixels/sec 1.05 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.58 Gpixels/sec 1.22 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.29 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 20.6 Gpixels/sec 70.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 2042.2 FPS 2162.5 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Samples 3 tests 12 tests
Compute results use different APIs (Metal vs Vulkan/OpenCL) and are not directly comparable!

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 1351 -
Graphics test 10 FPS -
3DMark Solar Bay
5571
4266
Score 5571 4266
Stability - 74%
Graphics test 21 FPS 16 FPS
Section 1 23 FPS 20 FPS
Section 2 22 FPS 16 FPS
Section 3 19 FPS 12 FPS
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
3565
3335
Score 3565 3335
Stability 80% 71%
Graphics test 21 FPS 19 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 15272 -
Video editing score 5353 -
Data manipulation score 13696 -
Photo editing score 15932 -
Writing score 18803 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-04-12 (Shigetora)AnTuTu 111811839
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-02-06 (Geoff Jan)AnTuTu 111405303
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-12-06 (Tuแบฅn Nguyแป…n)AnTuTu 111755232
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-04-19 (ColorOS 15)Geekbench 6 GPU9624
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-04-19 (ColorOS 15)Geekbench 6 CPU1732 / 4274
Apple A16 Bionic
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-10-09 (Gurudev)AnTuTu 111226584
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Peltsi74)AnTuTu 111477304
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-21 (ะั‚ะพะผะฝะฐั ะฑะพะผะฑะฐ)AnTuTu 111772840
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-19 (Bear lover)AnTuTu 111714105
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-09-14 (ZUSEPRO)AnTuTu 111603687

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 9200 and A16 Bionic

CPU

Architecture 1x 3.05 GHz โ€“ Cortex-X3
3x 2.85 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A715
4x 1.8 GHz โ€“ Cortex-A510
2x 3.46 GHz โ€“ Everest
4x 2.02 GHz โ€“ Sawtooth
Cores 8 6
Frequency 3050 MHz 3460 MHz
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.6-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 16 MB
L3 cache 8 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Transistor count 17 billion 16 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 7 W 8 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 Apple A16 GPU
Architecture Valhall 4th gen Apple Bionic GPU
GPU frequency 981 MHz 1398 MHz
Pipelines 11 5
Shading units 128 128
Total shaders 1408 640
FLOPS 2762.5 Gigaflops 1789.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 690 Apple Neural Engine
NPU theoretical performance - 17 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 68.2 Gb/s 51.2 Gb/s
Max size 24 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 NVMe
Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2796 x 1290
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 48MP
Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem MediaTek T800 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7900 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 4200 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 6
Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced November 2022 September 2022
Class Flagship Flagship
Model number MT6985 APL1W10
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 9200 official site -
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 9500 - Apple A19 Pro

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1567 (80.9%)
371 (19.1%)
Total votes: 1938

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of A16 Bionic and Dimensity 9200, or ask any questions
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Jones Agyemang August 18, 2023 at 12:24 AM
The comparison between MediaTek Dimensity 9200 and Apple's A16 Bionic is particularly intriguing, especially since both are manufactured by TSMC.
+10 Reply
Avatar
Hossein April 24, 2023 at 10:34 AM
We should actually compare them in a phone not just with the numbers and information. We all know iPhones have great stability and power in gaming. Anyhow for some years later, we couldn't find how really they are different.
+22 Reply
Avatar
ItzRandom August 23, 2023 at 07:28 AM
Are you sure iphones have better stability? Well, if that's the case, then why iphones heat up so much that they throttle in 10 mins stress test?
+10 Reply
Avatar
ItzRandom March 4, 2023 at 10:10 PM
Wait a minute.....73 FPS in 3D mark...WITH 95% STABILITY !!! Apple has a long way to catch up android in gaming ๐ŸŽฎ๐Ÿฅฑ Maybe next year reaches 67 fps??
+137 Reply
Avatar
Zhinazhu January 4, 2023 at 10:21 AM
It's hard to believe that Apple lost to MediaTek in terms of GPU, but at least Apple is still stronger than Samsung Exynos, don't be discouraged.
+33 Reply
Avatar
Jonathan Gerner February 24, 2023 at 06:17 AM
But still, gaming performance is way better in Bionic, antutu score doesn't matter optimization matter ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜†
+23 Reply
Avatar
Yur April 10, 2023 at 01:51 PM
Jonathan Gerner, Apple heats up and lags
+19 Reply
Avatar
some_rndm_dude June 2, 2023 at 05:05 AM
Jonathan Gerner, optimization? lol, with the same resolution on games using High/Ultra High, iPhone heats up very very fast which means poor optimization
+11 Reply